HP ProDesk 400 G1 MT

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (43rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 57 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 60.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics1.11% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemHP ProDesk 400 G1 MT  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 198E
Memory12.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20140717
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 06 '23 at 02:03
Run Duration155 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU10%

 PC Performing as expected (43rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-4330-$140
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
60.7% Good
Memory 85.1
1-Core 94
2-Core 145
66% 108 Pts
4-Core 214
8-Core 204
28% 209 Pts
64-Core 246
15% 246 Pts
Poor: 49%
This bench: 60.7%
Great: 69%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 8350
HP(103C 2127) 1GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.2401.1001
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
1.11% Terrible
Lighting 1.2
Reflection 2.5
Parallax 1.7
1% 1.8 fps
MRender 2
Gravity 0.9
Splatting 2
1% 1.63 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.11%
Great: 1%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kimtigo 256GB 256GB
149GB free (System drive)
Firmware: ZD0R3G0J
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 396
Write 395
Mixed 312
82% 368 MB/s
4K Read 24.5
4K Write 55.4
4K Mixed 27.8
102% 35.9 MB/s
DQ Read 130
DQ Write 269
DQ Mixed 207
156% 202 MB/s
Poor: 56% Great: 244%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$28
930GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 182
Write 171
Mixed 95.5
111% 150 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 1.2
232% 1.67 MB/s
Poor: 52% Great: 109%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
M378B1G73AH0-K0 Samsung M378B1G73DB0-CK0 16GB
1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
53.8% Above average
MC Read 18.1
MC Write 20.2
MC Mixed 17
53% 18.4 GB/s
SC Read 14.5
SC Write 18.4
SC Mixed 17.9
48% 16.9 GB/s
Latency 71.8
56% 71.8 ns
Poor: 48%
This bench: 53.8%
Great: 59%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ProDesk 400 G1 MT Builds (Compare 1,057 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: HP ProDesk 400 G1 MT

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 67% - Good Total price: $142
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year so they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $124Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback