Asrock A320M-HDV R4.0

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 28% Raft	Desktop 79% Battleship	Workstation 26% Raft


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (80th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 20 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	29.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

15 months ago, 15 months ago, 1 month ago.

Motherboard	Asrock A320M-HDV R4.0 (all builds)
Memory	11.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit kleuren
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20191113
Uptime	7.3 Days
Run Date	Feb 05 '23 at 18:05
Run Duration	154 Seconds
Run User	NLD-User
Background CPU	8%

Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing above expectations (80^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 5 2600-$150 179,588 User benchmarks, average bench 73% AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (85^th percentile)	76.5% Very good	Memory 75.5 1-Core 116 2-Core 228 77% 140 Pts	4-Core 416 8-Core 668 67% 542 Pts	64-Core 816 50% 816 Pts
Poor: 67% ↑ This bench: 76.5% Great: 81%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59 946,701 User benchmarks, average bench 29% Nvidia(10DE 1C82) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 522.30 Performing below potential (76^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	29.7% Poor	Lighting 37.5 Reflection 41.6 Parallax 38.6 31% 39.2 fps	MRender 37.9 Gravity 39.6 Splatting 27.9 28% 35.1 fps
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 29.7% Great: 33%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
WDC WDS120G2G0B-00EPW0 120GB 30,897 User benchmarks, average bench 43% 12GB free (System drive) Firmware: UI510000 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 420 Write 290 Mixed 199 67% 303 MB/s	4K Read 20.8 4K Write 31.1 4K Mixed 8.9 59% 20.3 MB/s	DQ Read 64.7 DQ Write 38.6 DQ Mixed 37.2 32% 46.8 MB/s
Poor: 33% Great: 52%
Sandisk S3 500G 500GB 12,292 User benchmarks, average bench 92% 79GB free Firmware: 415000RL SusWrite @10s intervals: 36 37 37 38 39 38 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 63% Great: 116%
Toshiba P300 1TB-$45 318,836 User benchmarks, average bench 84% 800GB free Firmware: MS2OA8R0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 132 133 132 131 131 138 MB/s Performing as expected (47^th percentile)	85.1% Excellent	Read 164 Write 174 Mixed 41.3 SusWrite 133 93% 128 MB/s	4K Read 1.2 4K Write 2.1 4K Mixed 0.6 156% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 85.1% Great: 107%
Seagate Expansion Desk 3TB 13,194 User benchmarks, average bench 66% 2.5TB free Firmware: 0911 SusWrite @10s intervals: 182 187 189 187 184 189 MB/s Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	103% Outstanding	Read 173 Write 150 Mixed 80.7 SusWrite 186 108% 147 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 2.2 4K Mixed 0.8 159% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 103% Great: 103%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Crucial CT8G4DFS8266.M8FJ 2x8GB 1,133 User benchmarks, average bench 80% 2 of 2 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	93.4% Outstanding	MC Read 37.5 MC Write 34.6 MC Mixed 29.7 97% 33.9 GB/s	SC Read 23.9 SC Write 35.1 SC Mixed 26.3 81% 28.4 GB/s	Latency 89.2 45% 89.2 ns
Poor: 61% ↑ This bench: 93.4% Great: 94%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical A320M-HDV R4.0 Builds (Compare 6,011 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 39%

Jet ski

Desktop 79%

Battleship

Workstation 36%

Jet ski

Motherboard: Asrock A320M-HDV R4.0

CPU
Ryzen 5 2600AMD $150Bench 73%, 179,588 samples	871x
Ryzen 3 3200GAMD $75Bench 63%, 104,122 samples	715x
Ryzen 5 3600AMD $84Bench 83%, 1,072,639 samples	545x

GPU
RX 570AMD $130Bench 45%, 473,685 samples	458x
RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples	426x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	405x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	204x
Green 240GB (2018)WD $34Bench 45%, 156,194 samples	155x
SU630 240GBAdataBench 64%, 60,212 samples	150x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $39Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	131x
TEAMGROUP-UD4-3200 2x8GBUnknownBench 85%, 99,207 samples	127x
DDR4 3000 2x8GBAdataBench 80%, 77,202 samples	115x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 90% - Excellent

Total price: $347

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $289	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $168	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16