Asus F2A85-V

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 50%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (30th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 70 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 49.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics5.7% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive52.6% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
16 months ago, 14 months ago.
MotherboardAsus F2A85-V  (all builds)
Memory3.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20141126
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateFeb 05 '23 at 15:21
Run Duration131 Seconds
Run User LVA-User
Background CPU6%

 PC Performing below expectations (30th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A10-6800K APU (2013 D.Ri)-$467
FM2 , 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 4.1 GHz, turbo 4.15 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
49.4% Average
Memory 66.5
1-Core 67
2-Core 103
49% 78.8 Pts
4-Core 193
8-Core 162
24% 178 Pts
64-Core 172
11% 172 Pts
Poor: 39%
This bench: 49.4%
Great: 61%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon R7 Graphics
Asus(1043 8526) 2GB
Ram: 2GB, Driver: 22.10.01.03
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
5.7% Terrible
Lighting 7
Reflection 9.1
Parallax 7.3
6% 7.8 fps
MRender 5.8
Gravity 6.5
Splatting 8
6% 6.77 fps
Poor: 5%
This bench: 5.7%
Great: 7%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow V300 240GB-$35
148GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 60AA
SusWrite @10s intervals: 113 133 119 137 134 148 MB/s
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
52.6% Above average
Read 278
Write 209
Mixed 215
SusWrite 131
47% 208 MB/s
4K Read 21.5
4K Write 42.8
4K Mixed 25.2
88% 29.8 MB/s
DQ Read 162
DQ Write 124
DQ Mixed 156
113% 147 MB/s
Poor: 41%
This bench: 52.6%
Great: 85%
Microsoft Storage Space Device 498GB
160GB free
Firmware: 0.1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 77 80 81 81 79 79 MB/s
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
46.4% Average
Read 82.3
Write 83.4
Mixed 42.4
SusWrite 79.6
53% 71.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 0.7
4K Mixed 0.6
100% 0.6 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 46.4%
Great: 90%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CML8GX3M2A2133C11 8GB
1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (4th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
27.3% Poor
MC Read 13.3
MC Write 5.8
MC Mixed 9.7
27% 9.6 GB/s
SC Read 5.5
SC Write 5.2
SC Mixed 7.7
18% 6.13 GB/s
Latency 110
36% 110 ns
Poor: 29%
This bench: 27.3%
Great: 41%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical F2A85-V Builds (Compare 39 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 51%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus F2A85-V - $165

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 43% - Average Total price: $667
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback