Dell Latitude E6440

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 58%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (66th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 34 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 60.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics3.9% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Run History
SystemDell Latitude E6440  (all builds)
MotherboardDell 0KRMDW
Memory3 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit couleurs,
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20170519
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 20 '17 at 16:35
Run Duration205 Seconds
Run User MAR-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing above expectations (66th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4610M
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3 GHz
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
60.9% Good
Memory 81.5
1-Core 95.2
2-Core 164
67% 114 Pts
4-Core 237
8-Core 227
31% 232 Pts
64-Core 237
15% 237 Pts
Poor: 39%
This bench: 60.9%
Great: 69%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4600 (Mobile 1.15 GHz)
Dell(1028 05BD) 2GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.3574
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
3.9% Terrible
Lighting 4.4
Reflection 6.73
Parallax 5.78
4% 5.64 fps
MRender 7.19
Gravity 1.97
Splatting 6.91
4% 5.36 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 3.9%
Great: 3%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate Laptop Thin SSHD 2.5" 500GB-$30
149GB free (System drive)
Firmware: DEMG Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
41.2% Average
Read 73.5
Write 68.7
Mixed 78.2
56% 73.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.41
4K Write 4.91
4K Mixed 0.43
156% 1.92 MB/s
Poor: 18%
This bench: 41.2%
Great: 64%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 8KTF51264HZ-1G6N1 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
53.6% Above average
MC Read 18.7
MC Write 21.9
MC Mixed 17.5
55% 19.4 GB/s
SC Read 11.1
SC Write 13.7
SC Mixed 13.9
37% 12.9 GB/s
Latency 77.8
51% 77.8 ns
Poor: 19%
This bench: 53.6%
Great: 57%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Latitude E6440 Builds (Compare 1,759 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 55%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: Dell Latitude E6440

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 21% - Poor Total price: $28
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, UserBenchmark's data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $26Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback