Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X705QA_X705QA

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 42%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (29th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 71 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 38.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics5.43% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive31.3% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (60%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAsus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X705QA_X705QA  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK X705QA
Memory1.2 GB free of 4 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210521
Uptime6.9 Days
Run DateFeb 05 '23 at 11:17
Run Duration136 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU 60%

 PC Performing below expectations (29th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A12-9720P APU (2016 M.BR)
P0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 2.85 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
38.9% Below average
Memory 56
1-Core 55.3
2-Core 97.3
42% 69.5 Pts
4-Core 126
8-Core 140
18% 133 Pts
64-Core 140
9% 140 Pts
Poor: 18%
This bench: 38.9%
Great: 45%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon R7 Graphics
Asus(1043 1911) 80MB
Ram: 80MB, Driver: 20.10.44.13
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
5.43% Terrible
Lighting 7
Reflection 5.6
Parallax 9.5
6% 7.37 fps
MRender 3.1
Gravity 8.6
Splatting 6
5% 5.9 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 5.43%
Great: 8%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston RBUSNS8180DS3256GJ 256GB
72GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFK61E1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 33 34 122 37 40 55 MB/s
Performing below potential (8th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
31.3% Below average
Read 157
Write 95.3
Mixed 164
SusWrite 53.4
26% 117 MB/s
4K Read 13.5
4K Write 22.6
4K Mixed 12.6
49% 16.2 MB/s
DQ Read 170
DQ Write 143
DQ Mixed 150
114% 154 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 31.3%
Great: 79%
Toshiba MQ04ABF100 1TB
448GB free
Firmware: JU0C0J
SusWrite @10s intervals: 113 112 114 119 120 122 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
54.7% Above average
Read 73
Write 118
Mixed 57.9
SusWrite 117
67% 91.2 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 4.3
4K Mixed 0.4
166% 1.9 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 54.7%
Great: 79%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMA851S6JJR6N-VK 1x4GB
1 of 4 slots used
4GB SODIMM DDR4 2400 MHz clocked @ 1866 MHz
Performing below potential (14th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
18% Very poor
MC Read 7.1
MC Write 5.5
MC Mixed 5.8
18% 6.13 GB/s
SC Read 3.8
SC Write 4.4
SC Mixed 4.8
12% 4.33 GB/s
Latency 140
29% 140 ns
Poor: 15%
This bench: 18%
Great: 42%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X705QA_X705QA Builds (Compare 9 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 39%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X705QA_X705QA

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback