| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (12th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 88 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
| Processor | With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 30.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor. |
| Graphics | 27.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times. |
| Memory | 12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Very high background CPU (84%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
| Motherboard | Asrock FM2A68M-DG3+ (all builds) |
| Memory | 8.9 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.6 GHz |
| Display | 1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20160112 |
| Uptime | 0 Days |
| Run Date | Feb 05 '23 at 01:09 |
| Run Duration | 166 Seconds |
| Run User | USA-User |
| Background CPU | 84% |
PC Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
30.2%
Below average
|
35% 61.6 Pts
|
18% 141 Pts
|
9% 150 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
CLim: 1987 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 471.41
Performing below potential (35th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
27.6%
Poor
|
28% 36.5 fps
|
26% 33.2 fps
| |
| Drive | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$31
905GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MS2OA750
SusWrite @10s intervals: 105 58 57 43 44 58 MB/s
|
54.8%
Above average
|
60% 83.4 MB/s
|
74% 0.5 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Samsung M378B1G73EB0-YK0 12GB
1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 4096 MB
|
18.9%
Very poor
|
19% 6.57 GB/s
|
16% 5.57 GB/s
|
19% 213 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical FM2A68M-DG3+ Builds (Compare 543 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Asrock FM2A68M-DG3+
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| A8-7680 Radeon R7, 10 Compute Cores 4C+6GAMDBench 43%, 2,565 samples | 62x |
| A8-7650K APU (2014 D.Ka)AMDBench 44%, 15,487 samples | 48x |
| A8-7600 APU (2014 D.Ka)AMDBench 42%, 31,243 samples | 39x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| Radeon R7 GraphicsAMDBench 6%, 37,078 samples | 37x |
| Radeon R7 GraphicsAMDBench 5%, 22,117 samples | 36x |
| GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 25x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 22% - Poor | Total price: $28 |