HP s5780d

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 40%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (18th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 82 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 37.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics3.4% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive64.9% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (39%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP s5780d  (all builds)
MotherboardMSI 2A9C
Memory2.5 GB free of 6 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20101105
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateFeb 04 '23 at 17:12
Run Duration131 Seconds
Run User SGP-User
Background CPU 39%

 PC Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3 550-$110
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.15 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
37.4% Below average
Memory 48.3
1-Core 63.5
2-Core 107
43% 73 Pts
4-Core 156
8-Core 148
20% 152 Pts
64-Core 128
8% 128 Pts
Poor: 36%
This bench: 37.4%
Great: 53%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 710
Sapphire(174B 326A) 2GB
CLim: 967 MHz, MLim: 450 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 471.68
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
3.4% Terrible
Lighting 4
Reflection 2.9
Parallax 4
3% 3.63 fps
MRender 4.1
Gravity 4
Splatting 5.1
4% 4.4 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.4%
Great: 4%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$80
277GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 213 209 220 227 238 237 MB/s
Performing below potential (2nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
64.9% Good
Read 249
Write 232
Mixed 240
SusWrite 224
53% 236 MB/s
4K Read 26.1
4K Write 41.6
4K Mixed 34.8
106% 34.2 MB/s
DQ Read 187
DQ Write 157
DQ Mixed 179
132% 174 MB/s
Poor: 74%
This bench: 64.9%
Great: 129%
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016)-$37
236GB free
Firmware: CC43
SusWrite @10s intervals: 129 131 128 130 130 132 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
70.7% Very good
Read 116
Write 96.1
Mixed 70.2
SusWrite 130
76% 103 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.7
139% 1 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 70.7%
Great: 113%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
CE80CE80 M378B5673FH0-CH9 83878387 SRT4G86U1-H9M 6GB
1333, 1333 MHz
2048, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
23.4% Poor
MC Read 8.8
MC Write 7.8
MC Mixed 8.6
24% 8.4 GB/s
SC Read 4.8
SC Write 6.2
SC Mixed 6.1
16% 5.7 GB/s
Latency 167
24% 167 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical s5780d Builds (Compare 5 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 51%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk

System: HP s5780d

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 40% - Below average Total price: $140
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback