Gigabyte GA-A320M-H-CF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 32%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 83%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 29%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (69th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 31 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics35.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive264% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
16 months ago, 16 months ago.
SystemGigabyte A320M-H
MotherboardGigabyte GA-A320M-H-CF  (all builds)
Memory11.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20220727
Uptime1.9 Days
Run DateFeb 04 '23 at 12:38
Run Duration236 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing above expectations (69th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 3400G-$99
AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
70.1% Very good
Memory 69.2
1-Core 124
2-Core 229
77% 141 Pts
4-Core 382
8-Core 592
60% 487 Pts
64-Core 606
38% 606 Pts
Poor: 54%
This bench: 70.1%
Great: 78%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 960-$198
Nvidia(10DE 1138) 2GB
CLim: 1468 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 528.24
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
35.3% Below average
Lighting 45.7
Reflection 47.1
Parallax 41.8
37% 44.9 fps
MRender 37.1
Gravity 42
Splatting 37.1
32% 38.7 fps
Poor: 30%
This bench: 35.3%
Great: 36%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SNV2S1000G 1TB
814GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBM02103
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1311 1649 1692 1765 1767 1768 MB/s
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
264% Outstanding
Read 1,949
Write 1731
Mixed 1410
SusWrite 1,659
379% 1,687 MB/s
4K Read 44.1
4K Write 113
4K Mixed 41.8
180% 66.4 MB/s
DQ Read 776
DQ Write 591
DQ Mixed 559
452% 642 MB/s
Poor: 150%
This bench: 264%
Great: 352%
SSD 2000GB 2TB
912GB free
Firmware: V0718B0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 382 410 421 432 433 432 MB/s
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
95.1% Outstanding
Read 498
Write 436
Mixed 418
SusWrite 418
100% 442 MB/s
4K Read 35.1
4K Write 89.3
4K Mixed 24.1
131% 49.5 MB/s
DQ Read 157
DQ Write 339
DQ Mixed 38.1
89% 178 MB/s
Poor: 68%
This bench: 95.1%
Great: 105%
Team T253X2512G 512GB
399GB free
Firmware: U0401A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 401 389 391 383 390 398 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
91.4% Outstanding
Read 498
Write 390
Mixed 346
SusWrite 392
91% 406 MB/s
4K Read 32
4K Write 83.6
4K Mixed 27.1
128% 47.6 MB/s
DQ Read 136
DQ Write 293
DQ Mixed 37.7
79% 156 MB/s
Poor: 32%
This bench: 91.4%
Great: 100%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 4TB
1TB free, PID 0900
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 94 90 90 89 90 89 MB/s
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
43.5% Average
Read 147
Write 146
Mixed 53.7
SusWrite 90.4
141% 109 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 0.7
4K Mixed 0.6
49% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 43.5%
Great: 53%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CMK16GX4M2A2133C13 CMK16GX4M2D3000C16 16GB
2133, 2133 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
73.8% Very good
MC Read 27.1
MC Write 27.1
MC Mixed 25.1
76% 26.4 GB/s
SC Read 20.7
SC Write 27.7
SC Mixed 22.8
68% 23.7 GB/s
Latency 103
39% 103 ns
Poor: 69%
This bench: 73.8%
Great: 73%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-A320M-H-CF Builds (Compare 2,924 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 34%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 29%
Raft

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-A320M-H-CF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 77% - Very good Total price: $233
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $289WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback