Asus P8Z77-V

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 87%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 67%
Battle cruiser
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (73rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 27 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 80.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics107% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive97.4% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (65%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsus P8Z77-V  (all builds)
Memory19.9 GB free of 24 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130813
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 04 '23 at 11:43
Run Duration173 Seconds
Run User BEL-User
Background CPU 65%
Watch Gameplay: 1080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3570K-$30
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
80.8% Excellent
Memory 91.9
1-Core 111
2-Core 225
81% 143 Pts
4-Core 408
8-Core 381
53% 394 Pts
64-Core 426
26% 426 Pts
Poor: 54%
This bench: 80.8%
Great: 79%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-$195
CLim: 2012 MHz, MLim: 2517 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 528.24
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
107% Outstanding
Lighting 136
Reflection 144
Parallax 138
111% 139 fps
MRender 117
Gravity 144
Splatting 123
104% 128 fps
Poor: 93%
This bench: 107%
Great: 110%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial MX200 250GB-$134
147GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MU02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 311 346 405 443 447 449 MB/s
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
97.4% Outstanding
Read 455
Write 446
Mixed 368
SusWrite 400
94% 417 MB/s
4K Read 27.4
4K Write 66.8
4K Mixed 37
124% 43.7 MB/s
DQ Read 376
DQ Write 349
DQ Mixed 258
222% 328 MB/s
Poor: 69%
This bench: 97.4%
Great: 113%
Crucial C300-CTFDDAC064MAG 64GB
17GB free
Firmware: 0002
SusWrite @10s intervals: 66 66 68 71 71 71 MB/s
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
46.5% Average
Read 326
Write 70.8
Mixed 114
SusWrite 69
32% 145 MB/s
4K Read 25.6
4K Write 47.7
4K Mixed 12.7
80% 28.7 MB/s
DQ Read 199
DQ Write 70.5
DQ Mixed 67.3
67% 112 MB/s
Poor: 37%
This bench: 46.5%
Great: 53%
WD Black 4TB (2013)-$182
3TB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 156 155 158 157 158 158 MB/s
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
86.1% Excellent
Read 143
Write 146
Mixed 89.7
SusWrite 157
98% 134 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 3.2
4K Mixed 1
204% 1.67 MB/s
Poor: 58%
This bench: 86.1%
Great: 98%
WD Green 2TB (2011)-$55
875GB free
Firmware: 51.0AB51
SusWrite @10s intervals: 85 89 92 90 91 89 MB/s
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
52.9% Above average
Read 94.6
Write 86.9
Mixed 80.7
SusWrite 89.3
65% 87.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.7
149% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 52.9%
Great: 67%
WD WD1600JD-22HBB0 160GB
119GB free
Firmware: 08.02D08
SusWrite @10s intervals: 54 54 54 54 54 54 MB/s
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
27% Poor
Read 39.8
Write 53.6
Mixed 28.8
SusWrite 53.7
32% 44 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.8
151% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 27%
Great: 32%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CML8GX3M2A1600C9 029E CML16GX3M2A1600C9 029E CML8GX3M2A1600C9 029E CML16GX3M2A1600C9 24GB
1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 8192, 4096, 8192 MB
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
62.7% Good
MC Read 22.7
MC Write 22.8
MC Mixed 20.2
63% 21.9 GB/s
SC Read 18.1
SC Write 20
SC Mixed 16.7
52% 18.3 GB/s
Latency 64.2
62% 64.2 ns
Poor: 45%
This bench: 62.7%
Great: 60%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P8Z77-V Builds (Compare 2,131 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 44%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 36%
Jet ski

Motherboard: Asus P8Z77-V

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 74% - Very good Total price: $391
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback