Lenovo V530 11BH

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (42nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 58 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 83.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Boot Drive156% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (24%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemLenovo V530 11BH  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO 3176
Memory17.4 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200604
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateFeb 04 '23 at 08:23
Run Duration226 Seconds
Run User LUX-User
Background CPU 24%

 PC Performing as expected (42nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-9400-$160
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
83.5% Excellent
Memory 85.1
1-Core 119
2-Core 238
82% 148 Pts
4-Core 460
8-Core 541
65% 501 Pts
64-Core 705
44% 705 Pts
Poor: 78%
This bench: 83.5%
Great: 91%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SKHynix_HFS256GD9TNG-L5B0B 256GB
72GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 80750C10
SusWrite @10s intervals: 526 362 362 320 254 218 MB/s
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
156% Outstanding
Read 1,253
Write 634
Mixed 496
SusWrite 340
150% 681 MB/s
4K Read 44.1
4K Write 115
4K Mixed 41.3
181% 66.8 MB/s
DQ Read 525
DQ Write 883
DQ Mixed 454
415% 621 MB/s
Poor: 88%
This bench: 156%
Great: 183%
Microsoft Storage Space Device 193GB
495GB free
Firmware: 0.1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 432 438 439 437 438 440 MB/s
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
92% Outstanding
Read 374
Write 436
Mixed 326
SusWrite 437
89% 393 MB/s
4K Read 28.1
4K Write 76.6
4K Mixed 33.2
126% 46 MB/s
DQ Read 222
DQ Write 310
DQ Mixed 166
154% 233 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 92%
Great: 110%
WD Elements 25A1 4TB
1.5TB free, PID 25a1
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 38 38 39 39 39 39 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
20.4% Poor
Read 54.2
Write 33
Mixed 29.2
SusWrite 38.5
50% 38.7 MB/s
4K Read 1.9
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 1
82% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 20%
This bench: 20.4%
Great: 61%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston KF2666C16D4/16G 2x16GB
2 of 2 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing below expectations (40th percentile)
84.6% Excellent
MC Read 31.4
MC Write 32.7
MC Mixed 28.9
89% 31 GB/s
SC Read 15.6
SC Write 29.2
SC Mixed 22.1
64% 22.3 GB/s
Latency 71.9
56% 71.9 ns
Poor: 51%
This bench: 84.6%
Great: 97%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $48
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback