Apple MacBookPro11,1

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (20th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 80 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 22.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics4.31% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemApple MacBookPro11,1  (all builds)
MotherboardApple Mac-189A3D4F975D5FFC
Memory5.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display2560 x 1600 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20220823
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 04 '23 at 07:22
Run Duration93 Seconds
Run User KNA-User
Background CPU 11%

 PC Performing below expectations (20th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4278U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 2.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
22.6% Poor
Memory 18.1
1-Core 64
2-Core 113
33% 65 Pts
4-Core 158
8-Core 151
21% 154 Pts
64-Core 156
10% 156 Pts
Poor: 39%
This bench: 22.6%
Great: 66%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel Iris Pro HD 5100 (Mobile 1.1 GHz)
Apple(106B 011A) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.4531
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
4.31% Terrible
Lighting 5.4
Reflection 8.5
Parallax 8.6
4% 7.5 fps
MRender 5.1
Gravity 3.7
Splatting 6
4% 4.93 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 4.31%
Great: 5%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Apple SD0128F PCIe 121GB
5GB free (System drive)
Firmware: A223321 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 508
Write 309
Mixed 234
77% 350 MB/s
4K Read 15.7
4K Write 32
4K Mixed 17.5
63% 21.7 MB/s
DQ Read 228
DQ Write 140
DQ Mixed 131
112% 166 MB/s
Poor: 57% Great: 110%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 0x384B54463531323634485A2D314736453120 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR3 1600 MHz
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
18.5% Very poor
MC Read 5.3
MC Write 8.7
MC Mixed 6.6
20% 6.87 GB/s
SC Read 2.9
SC Write 5.8
SC Mixed 4.5
13% 4.4 GB/s
Latency 335
12% 335 ns
Poor: 40%
This bench: 18.5%
Great: 55%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MacBookPro11,1 Builds (Compare 118 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 57%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: Apple MacBookPro11,1

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $128Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $29
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback