MSI A88X-G45 GAMING (MS-7900)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 43%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 32%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 47.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics87% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive81.5% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (16%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemMSI MS-7900
MotherboardMSI A88X-G45 GAMING (MS-7900)  (all builds)
Memory12.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit kolorów
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160408
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 03 '23 at 20:00
Run Duration178 Seconds
Run User POL-User
Background CPU 16%
Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (50th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A10-7850K APU (2014 D.Ka)-$135
P0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 4.15 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
47.1% Average
Memory 63.9
1-Core 71.5
2-Core 134
53% 89.7 Pts
4-Core 175
8-Core 186
24% 181 Pts
64-Core 174
11% 174 Pts
Poor: 33%
This bench: 47.1%
Great: 54%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$278
CLim: 1987 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 528.02
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
87% Excellent
Lighting 110
Reflection 114
Parallax 105
89% 110 fps
MRender 95.4
Gravity 104
Splatting 102
82% 100 fps
Poor: 71%
This bench: 87%
Great: 88%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 QVO 1TB-$109
216GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVQ0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 298 281 77 77 76 77 MB/s
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
81.5% Excellent
Read 438
Write 404
Mixed 358
SusWrite 148
76% 337 MB/s
4K Read 29.2
4K Write 83.7
4K Mixed 40.8
141% 51.2 MB/s
DQ Read 270
DQ Write 233
DQ Mixed 248
187% 250 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 81.5%
Great: 121%
Ct500mx5 0 500GB
8GB free
Firmware: M3CR
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 292
Write 177
Mixed 249
53% 239 MB/s
4K Read 22.6
4K Write 31.1
4K Mixed 26
84% 26.6 MB/s
DQ Read 132
DQ Write 121
DQ Mixed 89.9
78% 115 MB/s
Poor: 58% Great: 119%
WD Green 500GB (2009)-$23
105GB free
Firmware: 01.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 52 54 55 56 56 55 MB/s
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
38% Below average
Read 77.1
Write 78.8
Mixed 57.1
SusWrite 54.7
50% 66.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.7
144% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 20%
This bench: 38%
Great: 54%
Seagate Backup+ BK 1TB
6GB free
Firmware: 0410
SusWrite @10s intervals: 64 64 72 73 65 65 MB/s
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
50.9% Above average
Read 110
Write 39.7
Mixed 38.4
SusWrite 67.2
47% 63.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.9
167% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 50.9%
Great: 58%
Seagate Expansion 2TB
276GB free
Firmware: 9300
SusWrite @10s intervals: 44 57 67 72 72 67 MB/s
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
30.3% Below average
Read 41.6
Write 64.2
Mixed 39.8
SusWrite 63
38% 52.1 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 3
4K Mixed 0.4
154% 1.57 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 30.3%
Great: 67%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
HyperX Savage DDR3 2400 C11 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 2134 MHz clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below potential (9th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
41.7% Average
MC Read 17.9
MC Write 9.6
MC Mixed 18.1
43% 15.2 GB/s
SC Read 9.4
SC Write 8.7
SC Mixed 13
30% 10.4 GB/s
Latency 117
34% 117 ns
Poor: 33%
This bench: 41.7%
Great: 86%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical A88X-G45 GAMING (MS-7900) Builds (Compare 110 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 48%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: MSI A88X-G45 GAMING (MS-7900) - $119

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 55% - Above average Total price: $254
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $48
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback