TEST
YOUR PC
ADD TO PC
BUILD

HP Compaq Pro 6300 MT

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 51%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
Save results Copy results User guide
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (35th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 65 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 50.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics4.03% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive47.4% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (59%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP Compaq Pro 6300 MT  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 339A
Memory12.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1360 x 768 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120507
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 03 '23 at 08:51
Run Duration145 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU 59%

 PC Performing below expectations (35th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3350P-$60
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
50.9% Above average
Memory 70.2
1-Core 57.9
2-Core 144
53% 90.7 Pts
4-Core 173
8-Core 251
26% 212 Pts
64-Core 291
18% 291 Pts
Poor: 53% ↑
This bench: 50.9%
 Great: 74%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 240
Gainward(10B0 0401) 1GB
Ram: 1GB, Driver: 342.01
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
4.03% Terrible
Lighting 5.4
Reflection 2.8
Parallax 2.6
4% 3.6 fps
MRender 5.5
Gravity 4.3
Splatting 2.9
3% 4.23 fps
Poor: 3% ↑
This bench: 4.03%
 Great: 5%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
PNY 120GB SATA SSD 120GB
34GB free (System drive)
Firmware: V0218A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 144 84 92 45 44 55 MB/s
Performing below potential (11th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
47.4% Average
Read 250
Write 224
Mixed 215
SusWrite 77.4
43% 192 MB/s
4K Read 26.5
4K Write 46
4K Mixed 18.6
88% 30.4 MB/s
DQ Read 99.9
DQ Write 186
DQ Mixed 30.9
55% 106 MB/s
Poor: 42% ↑
This bench: 47.4%
 Great: 91%
WD Blue 640GB (2008)-$33
1GB free
Firmware: 01.03B01
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 76.8
Write 74.5
Mixed 56.7
52% 69.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.6
117% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 31% Great: 62%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 500GB-$23
140GB free
Firmware: HP73
SusWrite @10s intervals: 104 110 109 108 112 111 MB/s
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
65.2% Good
Read 119
Write 96.9
Mixed 63.1
SusWrite 109
71% 96.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.7
125% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 27% ↑
This bench: 65.2%
 Great: 88%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378B5173BH0-CK0 M378B5173DB0-CK0 M378B5173DB0-CK0 M378B5173DB0-CK0 16GB
1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
43.5% Average
MC Read 12.5
MC Write 20.1
MC Mixed 15.7
46% 16.1 GB/s
SC Read 7.3
SC Write 10.6
SC Mixed 8.9
26% 8.93 GB/s
Latency 101
40% 101 ns
Poor: 38% ↑
This bench: 43.5%
 Great: 60%
Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Typical Compaq Pro 6300 MT Builds (Compare 1,927 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 58%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: HP Compaq Pro 6300 MT

CPU
Core i5-3470Intel  $59Bench 63%, 223,595 samples917x
Core i7-3770Intel  $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples287x
Core i5-3570IntelBench 65%, 104,858 samples205x
GPU
HD 2500 (Desktop 1.05 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 146,665 samples419x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia  $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples191x
GT 1030NvidiaBench 14%, 185,384 samples129x
SSD
A400 240GBKingston  $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples87x
A400 120GBKingston  $26Bench 61%, 166,392 samples47x
A400 480GBKingston  $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples25x
RAM
8JTF51264AZ-1G6E1 1x4GBMicronBench 28%, 7,085 samples20x
8JTF51264AZ-1G6E1 2x4GBMicronBench 52%, 17,707 samples20x
M378B5173DB0-CK0 2x4GBSamsungBench 51%, 14,844 samples19x
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 72% - Very good Total price: $87
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year so they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $156Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback