Acer Veriton EN2580

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 63%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (61st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 39 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 56%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics8.04% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive140% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemAcer Veriton EN2580  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer Veriton EN2580(TGL)
Memory6.8 GB free of 12 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20210723
Uptime13.9 Days
Run DateFeb 02 '23 at 15:42
Run Duration133 Seconds
Run User BEL-User
Background CPU9%

 PC Performing above expectations (61st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Pentium Gold 7505
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
56% Above average
Memory 68.2
1-Core 109
2-Core 178
68% 119 Pts
4-Core 255
8-Core 252
34% 254 Pts
64-Core 259
16% 259 Pts
Poor: 26%
This bench: 56%
Great: 60%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics
Acer(1025 1518) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 30.0.101.1994
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
8.04% Terrible
Lighting 11
Reflection 8.3
Parallax 13.3
9% 10.9 fps
MRender 8.3
Gravity 15
Splatting 1.8
6% 8.37 fps
Poor: 5%
This bench: 8.04%
Great: 11%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme KINGSTON OM8PDP3128B-AA1 128GB
52GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EDFK0S03 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 123 141 288 491 260 115 MB/s
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
140% Outstanding
Read 1,351
Write 583
Mixed 232
SusWrite 236
131% 601 MB/s
4K Read 20.9
4K Write 130
4K Mixed 58.1
175% 69.6 MB/s
DQ Read 465
DQ Write 233
DQ Mixed 262
218% 320 MB/s
Poor: 70%
This bench: 140%
Great: 190%
Samsung 860 Evo 250GB-$52
151GB free
Firmware: RVT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 324 364 401 299 286 289 MB/s
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
106% Outstanding
Read 458
Write 413
Mixed 421
SusWrite 327
91% 405 MB/s
4K Read 40
4K Write 79.1
4K Mixed 51.4
168% 56.8 MB/s
DQ Read 361
DQ Write 309
DQ Mixed 327
247% 333 MB/s
Poor: 75%
This bench: 106%
Great: 128%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 99U5624-001.A00G Hynix HMA851S6DJR6N-XN 12GB
2400, 3200 MHz
8192, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
36.5% Below average
MC Read 13.4
MC Write 13.6
MC Mixed 11
36% 12.7 GB/s
SC Read 8.7
SC Write 13.2
SC Mixed 10.6
31% 10.8 GB/s
Latency 106
38% 106 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Veriton EN2580 Builds (Compare 7 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 14%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Veriton EN2580

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate a lot of reddit accounts. UserBenchmark exposes their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback