Lenovo 20HMCTO1WW

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 58%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 54.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics4.9% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive38% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (47%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemLenovo 20HMCTO1WW  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO 20HMCTO1WW
Memory2.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20221118
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateFeb 02 '23 at 14:28
Run Duration115 Seconds
Run User MYS-User
Background CPU 47%

 PC Performing as expected (55th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7500U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
54.9% Above average
Memory 80.3
1-Core 93.8
2-Core 155
66% 110 Pts
4-Core 162
8-Core 231
25% 196 Pts
64-Core 180
11% 180 Pts
Poor: 22%
This bench: 54.9%
Great: 61%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 620 (Mobile Kaby Lake)
Legend(17AA 5062) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 25.20.100.6577
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
4.9% Terrible
Lighting 5.6
Reflection 2.8
Parallax 5.8
5% 4.73 fps
MRender 4.3
Gravity 5.9
Splatting 9.1
6% 6.43 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 4.9%
Great: 6%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Lexar 256GB SSD 256GB
71GB free (System drive)
Firmware: H190117D
SusWrite @10s intervals: 112 53 169 80 90 100 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile)
38% Below average
Read 303
Write 162
Mixed 193
SusWrite 101
42% 190 MB/s
4K Read 9.5
4K Write 28.7
4K Mixed 14.4
48% 17.5 MB/s
DQ Read 176
DQ Write 35.6
DQ Mixed 153
100% 121 MB/s
Poor: 54%
This bench: 38%
Great: 240%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Ramaxel RMSA3260MB78HAF2400 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (15th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
28.7% Poor
MC Read 10.7
MC Write 9.5
MC Mixed 8.9
28% 9.7 GB/s
SC Read 7.4
SC Write 6.6
SC Mixed 5.7
19% 6.57 GB/s
Latency 80
50% 80 ns
Poor: 22%
This bench: 28.7%
Great: 43%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 20HMCTO1WW Builds (Compare 11 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 51%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 20HMCTO1WW

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate a lot of reddit accounts. UserBenchmark exposes their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback