Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (3rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 97 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 10.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Boot Drive	29% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (98%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing way below expectations (3^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD A8-6410 APU R5 Graphics 19,683 User benchmarks, average bench 32% Socket FT3b, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 1.55 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (1^st percentile)	10.5% Very poor	Memory 15.5 1-Core 9.7 2-Core 17.6 9% 14.3 Pts	4-Core 30.7 8-Core 40.4 5% 35.6 Pts	64-Core 35.1 2% 35.1 Pts
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 10.5% Great: 41%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
WD Blue SA510 2.5 500GB 3,744 User benchmarks, average bench 85% 431GB free (System drive) Firmware: 52020100 SusWrite @10s intervals: 107 100 106 118 116 89 MB/s Performing below potential (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	29% Poor	Read 153 Write 151 Mixed 131 SusWrite 106 30% 135 MB/s	4K Read 7.7 4K Write 13.7 4K Mixed 10 32% 10.5 MB/s	DQ Read 150 DQ Write 142 DQ Mixed 97.8 87% 130 MB/s
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 29% Great: 108%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown D3R8GS16B8R 2x8GB 14 User benchmarks, average bench 39% 2 of 2 slots used 16GB SODIMM DDR3 1333 MHz clocked @ 667 MHz Performing below potential (7^th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	9.44% Terrible	MC Read 3.8 MC Write 2.8 MC Mixed 3.5 10% 3.37 GB/s	SC Read 2 SC Write 2 SC Mixed 2.4 6% 2.13 GB/s	Latency 356 11% 356 ns
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 9.44% Great: 58%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 6%

Tree trunk

Desktop 33%

Sail boat

Workstation 5%

Tree trunk

CPU
A8-6410 APU R5 GraphicsAMDBench 32%, 19,683 samples	3x

GPU
Radeon R5AMDBench 2%, 40,685 samples	3x

SSD
SU650 240GBAdata $70Bench 70%, 47,016 samples	1x
256GB 256GBMidasforceBench 90%, 1,014 samples	1x

RAM
M471B5273DH0-CK0 M471B5173DB0-YK0 8GBSamsungBench 45%, 203 samples	1x
M471B5173DB0-YK0 Elpida EBJ40UG8EFU0-GN-F 8GBSamsungBench 48%, 175 samples	1x
HMT451S6BFR8A-PB Samsung M471B5173QH0-YK0 8GBHynixBench 47%, 1,364 samples	1x

Value: 12% - Very poor

Total price: $70

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16