Performance Results


Gaming 11% Tree trunk	Desktop 66% Battle cruiser	Workstation 10% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (67th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 33 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	3.34% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	78% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

PC Performing above expectations (67^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon E5-1620 0-$345 17,464 User benchmarks, average bench 70% CPU0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (73^rd percentile)	71.5% Very good	Memory 84.7 1-Core 90.6 2-Core 177 69% 118 Pts	4-Core 320 8-Core 430 48% 375 Pts	64-Core 433 27% 433 Pts
Poor: 61% ↑ This bench: 71.5% Great: 77%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia Quadro K600 8,087 User benchmarks, average bench 3% HP(103C 094B) 1GB CLim: 875 MHz, MLim: 445 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 353.30 Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	3.34% Terrible	Lighting 3.9 Reflection 5.3 Parallax 4.4 3% 4.53 fps	MRender 4.9 Gravity 3.9 Splatting 4.6 4% 4.47 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 3.34% Great: 4%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
SSD240GXACTT-003Z 240GB 17 User benchmarks, average bench 72% 185GB free (System drive) Firmware: XQ61.2GB SusWrite @10s intervals: 354 113 99 100 104 102 MB/s Performing as expected (53^rd percentile)	78% Very good	Read 464 Write 223 Mixed 353 SusWrite 145 66% 297 MB/s	4K Read 31.4 4K Write 59.8 4K Mixed 33.5 122% 41.6 MB/s	DQ Read 279 DQ Write 302 DQ Mixed 202 176% 261 MB/s
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 78% Great: 83%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Micron 9KSF25672AZ-1G6K1 4x2GB 181 User benchmarks, average bench 69% 4 of 8 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing way above expectations (90^th percentile)	81.5% Excellent	MC Read 31.5 MC Write 34 MC Mixed 28.8 90% 31.4 GB/s	SC Read 15.4 SC Write 14 SC Mixed 11.9 39% 13.8 GB/s	Latency 72.3 55% 72.3 ns
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 81.5% Great: 85%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 12%

Tree trunk

Desktop 67%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 11%

Tree trunk

GPU
Quadro K2000NvidiaBench 7%, 13,526 samples	498x
Quadro K4000NvidiaBench 13%, 11,114 samples	307x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	263x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	185x
C400 RealSSD 256GBMicronBench 55%, 11,652 samples	129x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	113x

RAM
M391B5273DH0-CK0 4x4GBSamsungBench 72%, 618 samples	65x
M391B5273DH0-CK0 8x4GBSamsungBench 89%, 244 samples	58x
HMT41GU7AFR8C-RD 4x8GBHynixBench 89%, 207 samples	56x

Value: 62% - Good

Total price: $373