ADD TO PC
BUILD

MSI MS-1583

Performance Results


Gaming 25% Raft	Desktop 98% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 25% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 92.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics	20.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Windows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.

Run History

16 months ago, 16 months ago, 16 months ago, 16 months ago.

System	Micro-Star Pulse GL66 12UGKV
Motherboard	MSI MS-1583 (all builds)
Memory	55.5 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 11
BIOS Date	20220118
Uptime	2 Days
Run Date	Feb 01 '23 at 15:33
Run Duration	156 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	1%

PC Performing as expected (51^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-12700H 52,857 User benchmarks, average bench 97% U3E1, 1 CPU, 14 cores, 20 threads Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (17^th percentile)	92.4% Outstanding	Memory 53.9 1-Core 191 2-Core 377 104% 207 Pts	4-Core 699 8-Core 1,124 112% 912 Pts	64-Core 1,060 66% 1,060 Pts
Poor: 91% ↑ This bench: 92.4% Great: 102%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel Iris Xe Graphics FAQ - How to force Optimus or Switchable discrete GPUs? MSI(1462 1333) 1GB Driver: <> Ver. 31.0.101.3729 Performing above expectations (85^th percentile)	20.3% Poor	Lighting 23.5 Reflection 158 Parallax 26.4 19% 69.5 fps	MRender 26 Gravity 35.3 Splatting 22.7 22% 28 fps
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 20.3% Great: 21%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Micron_2450_MTFDKBA512TFK 512GB 4,667 User benchmarks, average bench 203% 143GB free (System drive) Firmware: V5MA010 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 1,504 Write 2,878 Mixed 1,634 453% 2,005 MB/s	4K Read 61.7 4K Write 265 4K Mixed 87.5 346% 138 MB/s	DQ Read 1,480 DQ Write 1039 DQ Mixed 1,300 960% 1,273 MB/s
Poor: 98% Great: 307%
Fanxiang S500PRO 2TB 1,049 User benchmarks, average bench 279% 2TB free Firmware: SN09273 SusWrite @10s intervals: 2062 2311 2216 2081 2092 2169 MB/s Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	369% Outstanding	Read 1,936 Write 2,470 Mixed 1,938 SusWrite 2155 481% 2,125 MB/s	4K Read 59 4K Write 205 4K Mixed 91.2 315% 118 MB/s	DQ Read 1,838 DQ Write 958 DQ Mixed 891 798% 1,229 MB/s
Poor: 168% ↑ This bench: 369% Great: 368%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Team Group Inc TEAMGROUP-SD4-3200 2x31.5GB 542 User benchmarks, average bench 88% 2 of 2 slots used 63GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	60.5% Good	MC Read 23 MC Write 22.1 MC Mixed 21.1 63% 22.1 GB/s	SC Read 13.5 SC Write 23.8 SC Mixed 17.9 53% 18.4 GB/s	Latency 147 27% 147 ns
Poor: 60% ↑ This bench: 60.5% Great: 104%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Typical MS-1583 Builds (Compare 2,013 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming

Gaming 25%

Raft

Desktop

Desktop 100%

Nuclear submarine

Workstation

Workstation 26%

Raft

Motherboard: MSI MS-1583

CPU
Core i7-12700HIntelBench 97%, 52,857 samples	1,332x
Core i9-12900HIntelBench 99%, 15,403 samples	291x
Core i7-12650HIntelBench 96%, 16,339 samples	283x

GPU
Iris Xe GraphicsIntelBench 16%, 72,765 samples	827x
RTX 3060 (Laptop)NvidiaBench 90%, 102,706 samples	479x
RTX 3070 (Laptop)NvidiaBench 114%, 45,297 samples	359x

SSD
Micron_2450_MTFDKBA1T0TFK 1TBBench 252%, 10,807 samples	898x
Micron_2450_MTFDKBA512TFK 512GBBench 203%, 4,667 samples	341x
Micron_3400_MTFDKBA1T0TFH 1TBBench 389%, 5,529 samples	100x

RAM
M471A1K43EB1-CWE 2x8GBSamsungBench 86%, 38,732 samples	958x
8ATF1G64HZ-3G2R1 2x8GBMicronBench 83%, 15,291 samples	289x
M471A2K43EB1-CWE 2x16GBSamsungBench 87%, 6,443 samples	186x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?

Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. When UserBenchmark’s data contradicts their marketing spiel, they deflect by systematically attacking our reputation.

Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?

PC brands make a lot of their profit from flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers to choose hardware that offers similar real world performance at a fraction of the cost.

Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?

We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to make positive content about us. Additionally, the brands with weaker products tend to spend more on youtube marketing, which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.

Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?

Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community that's open and accessible to all. Looking at its 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, which are mostly written by virgin accounts, it is glaringly obvious that they were created by a marketing team. Real users don’t have any time or interest to promote one brand over another.

Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?

Instead of trying to win lucrative sponsorship deals with billion dollar PC brands, we have spent the last 13 years 100% focussed on providing comprehensive, accurate and relevant information for our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again because collectively they save millions of dollars every year.

The Best.

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159	Nvidia RTX 4060 $280	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission

Today's hottest

Amazon Ebay

deals

CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD

Build

Test

EFps

Can You Run It?

►
YouTube
*NEW*

About • User Guide • FAQs • Email • Privacy • Developer • YouTube Feedback