HP Spectre x360 Convertible

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 39%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (9th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 91 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 34%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics5.73% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive61.7% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (17%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemHP Spectre x360 Convertible  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 81A1
Memory0.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190701
Uptime1.2 Days
Run DateJan 31 '23 at 20:24
Run Duration121 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 17%

 PC Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6560U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 2.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
34% Below average
Memory 45.1
1-Core 59.4
2-Core 90.8
39% 65.1 Pts
4-Core 134
8-Core 133
18% 134 Pts
64-Core 142
9% 142 Pts
Poor: 36%
This bench: 34%
Great: 63%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel Iris 540 (Mobile Skylake)
HP(103C 8297) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 21.20.16.4727
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
5.73% Terrible
Lighting 6.8
Reflection 6.1
Parallax 7.4
6% 6.77 fps
MRender 7.6
Gravity 7.1
Splatting 7.6
6% 7.43 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 5.73%
Great: 10%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme THNSN51T02DU7 TO 1TB
334GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 57HA4103 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 294 274 290 340 259 326 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
61.7% Good
Read 509
Write 328
Mixed 616
SusWrite 297
98% 438 MB/s
4K Read 13
4K Write 23.3
4K Mixed 19.5
57% 18.6 MB/s
DQ Read 158
DQ Write 71.5
DQ Mixed 103
79% 111 MB/s
Poor: 95%
This bench: 61.7%
Great: 248%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Elpida EDFB164A1MA-JD-F 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB Row of chips LPDDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
28.3% Poor
MC Read 7.2
MC Write 15.2
MC Mixed 8.4
29% 10.3 GB/s
SC Read 5.6
SC Write 9.8
SC Mixed 6.6
21% 7.33 GB/s
Latency 180
22% 180 ns
Poor: 41%
This bench: 28.3%
Great: 57%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Spectre x360 Convertible Builds (Compare 571 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 48%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: HP Spectre x360 Convertible

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback