Lenovo 81WB

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 48%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 47.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics6.1% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive95.3% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
High background CPU (24%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemLenovo 81WB  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO LNVNB161216
Memory5.5 GB free of 12 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit renk
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20220125
Uptime7 Days
Run DateJan 31 '23 at 19:10
Run Duration130 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU 24%

 PC Performing as expected (46th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-10210U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.1 GHz, turbo 1.6 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
47.4% Average
Memory 67.7
1-Core 43.8
2-Core 85.2
42% 65.6 Pts
4-Core 149
8-Core 209
22% 179 Pts
64-Core 206
13% 206 Pts
Poor: 26%
This bench: 47.4%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics
Legend(17AA 3FD2) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 30.0.100.9864
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
6.1% Terrible
Lighting 6.9
Reflection 11.4
Parallax 7.8
6% 8.7 fps
MRender 6.6
Gravity 6.9
Splatting 11.1
7% 8.2 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 6.1%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SKHynix_HFM256GDHTNI-87A0B 256GB
52GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 11020C00
SusWrite @10s intervals: 423 304 337 239 183 181 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
95.3% Outstanding
Read 761
Write 805
Mixed 695
SusWrite 278
142% 635 MB/s
4K Read 33.1
4K Write 45.2
4K Mixed 33.4
117% 37.2 MB/s
DQ Read 346
DQ Write 181
DQ Mixed 257
193% 261 MB/s
Poor: 93%
This bench: 95.3%
Great: 176%
WD Elements 1TB
495GB free, PID 1048
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 55 56 56 55 56 56 MB/s
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
31.6% Below average
Read 93
Write 92.7
Mixed 53.5
SusWrite 55.6
97% 73.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.9
97% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 31.6%
Great: 43%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A5244CB0-CWE M471A1G43DB0-CPB 12GB
2133, 2133 MHz
4096, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (25th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
43.7% Average
MC Read 16.2
MC Write 16.2
MC Mixed 14.3
44% 15.6 GB/s
SC Read 8.4
SC Write 15.8
SC Mixed 12.3
35% 12.2 GB/s
Latency 107
37% 107 ns
Poor: 33%
This bench: 43.7%
Great: 75%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 81WB Builds (Compare 1,741 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 56%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 81WB

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback