Gigabyte GA-A520M H

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 118%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 102%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 117%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (77th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 23 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 105%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics112% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive99.2% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
16 months ago, 16 months ago.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-A520M H  (all builds)
Memory27.8 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20220826
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 31 '23 at 16:20
Run Duration123 Seconds
Run User AUT-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing above expectations (77th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 5700X-$166
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 4.5 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
105% Outstanding
Memory 82.2
1-Core 170
2-Core 342
105% 198 Pts
4-Core 681
8-Core 1,194
113% 938 Pts
64-Core 1,445
89% 1,445 Pts
Poor: 82%
This bench: 105%
Great: 108%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 6700
Sapphire(1DA2 E445) ≥ 4GB
Ram: 10GB, Driver: 22.11.1
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
112% Outstanding
Lighting 118
Reflection 137
Parallax 243
97% 166 fps
MRender 226
Gravity 121
Splatting 199
150% 182 fps
Poor: 106%
This bench: 112%
Great: 112%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Mpcm2satassd 512GB 512GB
439GB free (System drive)
Firmware: V0718B0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 407 406 415 418 415 417 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
99.2% Outstanding
Read 513
Write 427
Mixed 408
SusWrite 413
99% 440 MB/s
4K Read 36.4
4K Write 115
4K Mixed 26.2
150% 59.1 MB/s
DQ Read 148
DQ Write 285
DQ Mixed 35.2
78% 156 MB/s
Poor: 73%
This bench: 99.2%
Great: 97%
Toshiba HDWD220 2TB
2TB free
Firmware: KP000A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 189 186 188 188 188 186 MB/s
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
93.5% Outstanding
Read 139
Write 164
Mixed 67.1
SusWrite 187
102% 139 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.5
136% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 66%
This bench: 93.5%
Great: 104%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Adata 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
89.3% Excellent
MC Read 36.1
MC Write 26.3
MC Mixed 32.3
90% 31.6 GB/s
SC Read 28.8
SC Write 26.4
SC Mixed 34.5
85% 29.9 GB/s
Latency 76.6
52% 76.6 ns
Poor: 60%
This bench: 89.3%
Great: 108%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-A520M H Builds (Compare 621 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 89%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 84%
Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-A520M H

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 90% - Outstanding Total price: $413
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $156Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback