MSI B450 GAMING PLUS MAX (MS-7B86)

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 97.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics92% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemMicro-Star MS-7B86
MotherboardMSI B450 GAMING PLUS MAX (MS-7B86)  (all builds)
Memory11 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20220726
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 31 '23 at 16:13
Run Duration169 Seconds
Run User SAU-User
Background CPU 14%
Watch Gameplay: 2060 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (52nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 5600X-$120
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.4 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
97.9% Outstanding
Memory 80.1
1-Core 172
2-Core 333
103% 195 Pts
4-Core 620
8-Core 929
96% 775 Pts
64-Core 1,101
68% 1,101 Pts
Poor: 83%
This bench: 97.9%
Great: 107%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2060-$287
Asus(1043 86F0) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2145 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 528.24
Performing below potential (72nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
92% Outstanding
Lighting 116
Reflection 108
Parallax 111
94% 111 fps
MRender 134
Gravity 103
Splatting 93
88% 110 fps
Poor: 80%
This bench: 92%
Great: 97%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SA2000M 500GB
293GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S5Z4
SusWrite @10s intervals: 783 528 536 540 540 544 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 40% Great: 69%
External USB3.0 DISK03 500GB
443GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 98 100 101 102 99 100 MB/s
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
41.9% Average
Read 101
Write 85.8
Mixed 63.7
SusWrite 99.9
117% 87.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 1
94% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 41.9%
Great: 47%
External USB3.0 DISK00 2TB
1.5TB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 99 100 101 102 99 100 MB/s
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
54% Above average
Read 163
Write 154
Mixed 119
SusWrite 100
177% 134 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2.7
4K Mixed 0.9
126% 1.57 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 54%
Great: 68%
External USB3.0 DISK01 1TB
213GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 0.7 0.2 0.1 0.2 0 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
17.2% Very poor
Read 82.7
Write 82.3
Mixed 84.7
SusWrite 0.2
81% 62.5 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.6
78% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 17.2%
Great: 67%
External USB3.0 DISK02 2TB
1TB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: MB/s
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
28.4% Poor
Read 139
Write 141
Mixed 110
SusWrite 0.1
124% 97.5 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 0.9
123% 1.5 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 28.4%
Great: 67%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB-$40
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (21st percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
69.5% Good
MC Read 30.9
MC Write 16
MC Mixed 26.4
70% 24.4 GB/s
SC Read 25.1
SC Write 16.2
SC Mixed 26
64% 22.4 GB/s
Latency 80.4
50% 80.4 ns
Poor: 61%
This bench: 69.5%
Great: 110%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical B450 GAMING PLUS MAX (MS-7B86) Builds (Compare 8,944 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 78%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 74%
Battleship

Motherboard: MSI B450 GAMING PLUS MAX (MS-7B86)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 82% - Excellent Total price: $489
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year so they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $124Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback