Performance Results


Gaming 4% Tree trunk	Desktop 34% Sail boat	Workstation 4% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (19th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 81 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 34.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	3.43% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	20.9% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (41%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing way below expectations (19^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-4250U-$499 1,765 User benchmarks, average bench 50% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 1.9 GHz, turbo 2.05 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	34.5% Below average	Memory 50.8 1-Core 30.6 2-Core 76.5 33% 52.6 Pts	4-Core 106 8-Core 116 15% 111 Pts	64-Core 116 7% 116 Pts
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 34.5% Great: 59%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD 5000 (Mobile 1.0/1.1 GHz) 6,906 User benchmarks, average bench 3% Intel(8086 2054) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.4531 Performing below expectations (38^th percentile)	3.43% Terrible	Lighting 4.8 Reflection 1.7 Parallax 5.4 4% 3.97 fps	MRender 3 Gravity 2.5 Splatting 3.5 2% 3 fps
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 3.43% Great: 5%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100 951,591 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 64GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT01B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 40 31 36 38 34 34 MB/s Relative performance (0^th percentile)	20.9% Poor	Read 315 Write 41.5 Mixed 66.3 SusWrite 35.5 25% 114 MB/s	4K Read 14.5 4K Write 0.4 4K Mixed 0.7 23% 5.2 MB/s
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 20.9% Great: 124%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston 99U5428-017.A00LF 1x8GB 74 User benchmarks, average bench 28% 1 of 2 slots used 8GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing way below expectations (12^th percentile)	20.2% Poor	MC Read 7.4 MC Write 7.5 MC Mixed 6.1 20% 7 GB/s	SC Read 5.7 SC Write 4.6 SC Mixed 5.4 15% 5.23 GB/s	Latency 158 25% 158 ns
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 20.2% Great: 33%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 61%

Destroyer

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

GPU
HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 150,891 samples	1,322x
SVGA 3DVmwareBench 20%, 11,474 samples	1,143x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	1,044x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	824x
Virtual NVMe Disk 64GBVmwareBench 62%, 2,103 samples	457x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	425x

Value: 64% - Good

Total price: $325

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16