Asus H87-PRO

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (29th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 71 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 67.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics26.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (76%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus H87-PRO  (all builds)
Memory11.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130812
Uptime7.4 Days
Run DateJan 31 '23 at 11:21
Run Duration196 Seconds
Run User PRT-User
Background CPU 76%
Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (29th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4670-$51
SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
67.9% Good
Memory 75.5
1-Core 103
2-Core 199
71% 126 Pts
4-Core 353
8-Core 331
46% 342 Pts
64-Core 388
24% 388 Pts
Poor: 47%
This bench: 67.9%
Great: 77%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 528.24
Performing below potential (2nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
26.3% Poor
Lighting 32.2
Reflection 45
Parallax 36.6
26% 37.9 fps
MRender 37.6
Gravity 36.5
Splatting 25.8
26% 33.3 fps
Poor: 27%
This bench: 26.3%
Great: 33%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 250GB-$52
77GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT03B6Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 456
Write 454
Mixed 398
97% 436 MB/s
4K Read 36.3
4K Write 73.6
4K Mixed 49.9
158% 53.3 MB/s
DQ Read 380
DQ Write 345
DQ Mixed 358
270% 361 MB/s
Poor: 75% Great: 128%
Kingston A400 120GB-$28
60GB free
Firmware: SBFK71E0
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 357
Write 252
Mixed 239
63% 283 MB/s
4K Read 25
4K Write 69.3
4K Mixed 20.3
101% 38.2 MB/s
DQ Read 162
DQ Write 330
DQ Mixed 134
134% 209 MB/s
Poor: 33% Great: 85%
WD Purple 1TB (2014)-$40
870GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 128
Write 136
Mixed 72.8
83% 112 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.7
4K Mixed 1
194% 1.5 MB/s
Poor: 44% Great: 85%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$32
545GB free
Firmware: 15.01H15
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 139
Write 42.7
Mixed 39.8
54% 73.9 MB/s
4K Read 1.8
4K Write 0.7
4K Mixed 0.8
177% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 52% Great: 109%
Samsung FIT USB 3.0 64GB-$25
48GB free, PID 1000
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 258
Write 31.8
Mixed 54.4
103% 115 MB/s
4K Read 12.5
4K Write 16.8
4K Mixed 4.7
778% 11.3 MB/s
DQ Read 17.4
DQ Write 21.5
DQ Mixed 4.4
946% 14.4 MB/s
Poor: 14% Great: 112%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CT51264BA160BJ.C8F 1315 CT51264BD160BJ.M8F 1315 CT51264BA160B.C16F 1315 CT51264BD160BJ.M8F 16GB
1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
58.9% Above average
MC Read 21.7
MC Write 23
MC Mixed 17.9
60% 20.9 GB/s
SC Read 15.4
SC Write 19.4
SC Mixed 18.8
51% 17.9 GB/s
Latency 89.3
45% 89.3 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H87-PRO Builds (Compare 573 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 66%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus H87-PRO

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 56% - Above average Total price: $229
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $290Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback