ATEC A2TB7VCGB

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 109%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 110%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 117%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (65th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 35 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 111%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics95% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive218% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemATEC A2TB7VCGB  (all builds)
MotherboardGigabyte B660M HD3P
Memory8.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 4.8 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit색
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20220207
Uptime1.1 Days
Run DateJan 31 '23 at 05:29
Run Duration129 Seconds
Run User KOR-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (65th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-12700
U3E1, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 20 threads
Base clock 2.1 GHz, turbo 4.4 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
111% Outstanding
Memory 77.2
1-Core 197
2-Core 383
114% 219 Pts
4-Core 771
8-Core 1,370
129% 1,071 Pts
64-Core 2,060
128% 2,060 Pts
Poor: 100%
This bench: 111%
Great: 115%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2060-12GB
Nvidia(10DE 1F03) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 516.94
Performing below potential (45th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
95% Outstanding
Lighting 120
Reflection 106
Parallax 120
98% 115 fps
MRender 129
Gravity 112
Splatting 94.5
90% 112 fps
Poor: 86%
This bench: 95%
Great: 102%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZVL2256HCHQ-00B00 256GB
143GB free (System drive)
Firmware: GXA7301Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 553 541 545 539 538 534 MB/s
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
218% Outstanding
Read 2,067
Write 564
Mixed 810
SusWrite 542
218% 996 MB/s
4K Read 50
4K Write 120
4K Mixed 56.1
211% 75.4 MB/s
DQ Read 1,166
DQ Write 528
DQ Mixed 669
544% 788 MB/s
Poor: 146%
This bench: 218%
Great: 366%
Adata Ultimate SU800 512GB-$66
301GB free
Firmware: P0801A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 441 456 461 467 466 466 MB/s
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
108% Outstanding
Read 511
Write 461
Mixed 415
SusWrite 460
104% 462 MB/s
4K Read 30.5
4K Write 79.3
4K Mixed 44.5
145% 51.4 MB/s
DQ Read 328
DQ Write 304
DQ Mixed 271
216% 301 MB/s
Poor: 71%
This bench: 108%
Great: 127%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung 23R1GB4BB0-CQKOL 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM 22h clocked @ 4800 MHz
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
140% Outstanding
MC Read 61.6
MC Write 50
MC Mixed 50.6
154% 54.1 GB/s
SC Read 20.5
SC Write 47.6
SC Mixed 26.8
90% 31.6 GB/s
Latency 85.9
46% 85.9 ns
Poor: 113%
This bench: 140%
Great: 138%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical A2TB7VCGB Builds (Compare 1 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 107%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 109%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 116%
UFO

System: ATEC A2TB7VCGB

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback