Dell XPS 8930

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 34%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 97%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 31%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (69th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 31 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 91.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics27.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive227% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
16 months ago, 16 months ago.
SystemDell XPS 8930  (all builds)
MotherboardDell 0DF42J
Memory11.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20220923
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJan 30 '23 at 16:51
Run Duration225 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 14%
Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (69th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-8700-$186
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 4.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
91.9% Outstanding
Memory 91.1
1-Core 131
2-Core 264
90% 162 Pts
4-Core 498
8-Core 781
79% 640 Pts
64-Core 1,022
63% 1,022 Pts
Poor: 75%
This bench: 91.9%
Great: 94%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
Dell(1028 3512) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 528.02
Performing below potential (13th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
27.4% Poor
Lighting 34.3
Reflection 44.2
Parallax 32.1
28% 36.9 fps
MRender 37.4
Gravity 36.3
Splatting 25.5
26% 33.1 fps
Poor: 27%
This bench: 27.4%
Great: 33%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 980 NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$68
366GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3B4QFXO7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1665 1670 1666 1630 345 206 MB/s
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
227% Outstanding
Read 1,487
Write 1,833
Mixed 1632
SusWrite 1,197
347% 1,537 MB/s
4K Read 48.6
4K Write 92
4K Mixed 63.3
204% 68 MB/s
DQ Read 785
DQ Write 597
DQ Mixed 711
526% 698 MB/s
Poor: 144%
This bench: 227%
Great: 295%
Samsung 980 500GB
689GB free
Firmware: 3B4QFXO7
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1722 1731 1743 1760 1757 1763 MB/s
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
267% Outstanding
Read 1,589
Write 1,901
Mixed 1,717
SusWrite 1746
393% 1,738 MB/s
4K Read 49.7
4K Write 95.4
4K Mixed 64.1
208% 69.7 MB/s
DQ Read 821
DQ Write 613
DQ Mixed 738
546% 724 MB/s
Poor: 172%
This bench: 267%
Great: 355%
Samsung 840 Series 500GB
376GB free
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 468 471 470 471 438 354 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - drive id incomplete or inconclusive
Read 508
Write 476
Mixed 444
SusWrite 445
105% 468 MB/s
4K Read 41
4K Write 80.1
4K Mixed 52.5
172% 57.9 MB/s
DQ Read 384
DQ Write 337
DQ Mixed 356
268% 359 MB/s
Poor: 53% Great: 89%
TOSHIBA DT01ACA200 2TB
2TB free, PID 0621
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 197 196 197 196 195 197 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
78.2% Very good
Read 197
Write 192
Mixed 36.7
SusWrite 196
204% 156 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.6
96% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 78.2%
Great: 69%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 8ATF1G64AZ-2G6H1 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
84.1% Excellent
MC Read 32.2
MC Write 33.1
MC Mixed 23.3
84% 29.5 GB/s
SC Read 18.6
SC Write 36.6
SC Mixed 26.7
78% 27.3 GB/s
Latency 65.6
61% 65.6 ns
Poor: 62%
This bench: 84.1%
Great: 85%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical XPS 8930 Builds (Compare 6,471 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 32%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 30%
Raft

System: Dell XPS 8930

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 89% - Excellent Total price: $295
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year so they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $156Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback