Oegstone BOAMOT-500

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 64%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 55%
Gunboat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (35th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 65 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics90.4% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemOegstone BOAMOT-500  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK PRIME A320M-R
Memory9.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20191014
Uptime4.1 Days
Run DateJan 30 '23 at 14:13
Run Duration147 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 14%
Watch Gameplay: 2060 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (35th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 3400G Vega Graphics
AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 3.85 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
70.4% Very good
Memory 74.4
1-Core 112
2-Core 213
74% 133 Pts
4-Core 358
8-Core 570
57% 464 Pts
64-Core 576
36% 576 Pts
Poor: 54%
This bench: 70.4%
Great: 82%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2060-$287
Asus(1043 878E) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 516.94
Performing below potential (53rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
90.4% Outstanding
Lighting 114
Reflection 125
Parallax 121
93% 120 fps
MRender 133
Gravity 94.4
Splatting 92.5
85% 106 fps
Poor: 80%
This bench: 90.4%
Great: 97%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SanDisk Z400s 256GB-$221
12GB free (System drive)
Firmware: Z2333000
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 438
Write 258
Mixed 209
66% 302 MB/s
4K Read 22.9
4K Write 75.8
4K Mixed 13.4
92% 37.4 MB/s
DQ Read 163
DQ Write 281
DQ Mixed 83.7
102% 176 MB/s
Poor: 53% Great: 84%
WDC WDS500G2B0A 500GB
199GB free
Firmware: X61190WD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 248 391 412 425 428 425 MB/s
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
92.6% Outstanding
Read 429
Write 405
Mixed 271
SusWrite 388
84% 373 MB/s
4K Read 23.9
4K Write 77.7
4K Mixed 31.2
117% 44.3 MB/s
DQ Read 374
DQ Write 335
DQ Mixed 167
177% 292 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 92.6%
Great: 119%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$28
254GB free
Firmware: 02.01A02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 89 98 127 106 110 101 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
66.9% Good
Read 128
Write 146
Mixed 76.4
SusWrite 105
84% 114 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 1.1
209% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 66.9%
Great: 109%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial CT16G4DFD8266.C16FN 1x16GB
1 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz
Performing below potential (26th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
45.6% Average
MC Read 17.3
MC Write 13.6
MC Mixed 14.7
43% 15.2 GB/s
SC Read 17.9
SC Write 16.5
SC Mixed 16.4
48% 16.9 GB/s
Latency 91.6
44% 91.6 ns
Poor: 40%
This bench: 45.6%
Great: 53%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical BOAMOT-500 Builds (Compare 11 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 70%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk

System: Oegstone BOAMOT-500

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $156Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback