Acer Aspire MC605

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 21%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 18%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (36th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 64 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics24.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive55.7% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemAcer Aspire MC605  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer Aspire MC605
Memory4.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20121026
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 29 '23 at 21:27
Run Duration164 Seconds
Run User ROU-User
Background CPU8%

 PC Performing below expectations (36th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E3-1245
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
71.5% Very good
Memory 86.3
1-Core 91
2-Core 169
69% 116 Pts
4-Core 311
8-Core 425
46% 368 Pts
64-Core 429
26% 429 Pts
Poor: 61%
This bench: 71.5%
Great: 77%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD R9 270X-$199
MSI(1462 3030) 2GB
CLim: 1080 MHz, MLim: 1400 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 20.10.35.02
Performing below potential (15th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
24.1% Poor
Lighting 30.2
Reflection 33.8
Parallax 41
25% 35 fps
MRender 30
Gravity 31.4
Splatting 24.5
23% 28.6 fps
Poor: 25%
This bench: 24.1%
Great: 29%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Adata SU650 120GB-$14
14GB free (System drive)
Firmware: ZD0R3G5P
SusWrite @10s intervals: 204 210 218 227 156 55 MB/s
Performing below potential (37th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
55.7% Above average
Read 230
Write 222
Mixed 210
SusWrite 178
47% 210 MB/s
4K Read 21.8
4K Write 49.4
4K Mixed 27.3
94% 32.8 MB/s
DQ Read 94.7
DQ Write 191
DQ Mixed 140
107% 142 MB/s
Poor: 37%
This bench: 55.7%
Great: 88%
USB DISK 2.0 16GB
14GB free, PID 4300
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 5.5 9 7.6 9.6 9 8.3 MB/s
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
3.76% Terrible
Read 10
Write 1.2
Mixed 4
SusWrite 8.1
7% 5.82 MB/s
4K Read 2.3
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
8% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.76%
Great: 9%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT351U6CFR8C-PB Kingston ACR512X64D3U16C11G 8GB
1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (29th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
49.4% Average
MC Read 17.5
MC Write 17.3
MC Mixed 15.6
48% 16.8 GB/s
SC Read 14.3
SC Write 16.3
SC Mixed 15.8
44% 15.5 GB/s
Latency 71.1
56% 71.1 ns
Poor: 49%
This bench: 49.4%
Great: 61%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Aspire MC605 Builds (Compare 294 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Aspire MC605

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 49% - Average Total price: $139
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback