HP 500-508nt

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 27%
Raft
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (18th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 82 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 29.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics5.17% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (89%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemHP 500-508nt  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 2B35
Memory1.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit renk
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150210
Uptime4.6 Days
Run DateJan 29 '23 at 18:17
Run Duration142 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU 89%

 PC Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-770K (2014 D.Ka)
P0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 1.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
29.2% Poor
Memory 52.9
1-Core 10.9
2-Core 7.1
21% 23.6 Pts
4-Core 35.3
8-Core 32.9
5% 34.1 Pts
64-Core 12.7
1% 12.7 Pts
Poor: 32%
This bench: 29.2%
Great: 51%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD R7 240
Device(1B0A 90DF) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 780 MHz, MLim: 900 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 21.4.1
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
5.17% Terrible
Lighting 6.2
Reflection 7.5
Parallax 9.8
5% 7.83 fps
MRender 6.4
Gravity 7.3
Splatting 6.2
5% 6.63 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 5.17%
Great: 6%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$28
266GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MS2OA7C0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 142 117 131 134 134 120 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
65.1% Good
Read 97.1
Write 114
Mixed 41.4
SusWrite 130
70% 95.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.5
110% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 65.1%
Great: 107%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378B1G73QH0-CK0 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
15.4% Very poor
MC Read 5.5
MC Write 5.5
MC Mixed 6.3
16% 5.77 GB/s
SC Read 1.1
SC Write 0.7
SC Mixed 0.6
2% 0.8 GB/s
Latency 150
27% 150 ns
Poor: 19%
This bench: 15.4%
Great: 34%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $290Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $109Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback