MSI AM1I (MS-7865)

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 23%
Surfboard
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (23rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 77 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 27.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics1.43% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (31%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
19 months ago, 16 months ago.
SystemMSI MS-7865
MotherboardMSI AM1I (MS-7865)  (all builds)
Memory1.9 GB free of 6 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20141224
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJan 29 '23 at 13:08
Run Duration209 Seconds
Run User SRB-User
Background CPU 31%

 PC Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Sempron 3850 APU R3
P0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 1.3 GHz, turbo 1.3 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
27.7% Poor
Memory 45.8
1-Core 16.8
2-Core 26.1
22% 29.6 Pts
4-Core 57.5
8-Core 63.3
8% 60.4 Pts
64-Core 64
4% 64 Pts
Poor: 20%
This bench: 27.7%
Great: 34%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD HD 8280
MSI(1462 7865) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 22.6.1
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
1.43% Terrible
Lighting 1.5
Reflection 3
Parallax 2.1
1% 2.2 fps
MRender 2.2
Gravity 1.5
Splatting 2.8
2% 2.17 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.43%
Great: 2%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate ST500DL0 01 HD503HI 500GB
373GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1AJ1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 39 29 46 46 45 45 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
14.7% Very poor
Read 9.7
Write 22.3
Mixed 16
SusWrite 41.4
16% 22.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.1
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0.3
47% 0.3 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 14.7%
Great: 59%
Kingston DataTraveler 100 G3 USB 3.0 32GB-$9
13GB free, PID 1666
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2.3 1.3 2.3 2.7 1.6 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Read 150
Write 5.2
Mixed 5.2
SusWrite 2.1
30% 40.8 MB/s
4K Read 18.8
4K Mixed 0
105% 9.4 MB/s
Poor: 6% Great: 28%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 99U5474-015.A00LF 99U5584-005.A00LF 6GB
667, 800 MHz
2048, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (11th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
14.8% Very poor
MC Read 5.9
MC Write 3.9
MC Mixed 5.3
14% 5.03 GB/s
SC Read 3.8
SC Write 2.8
SC Mixed 4.8
11% 3.8 GB/s
Latency 177
23% 177 ns
Poor: 15%
This bench: 14.8%
Great: 38%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical AM1I (MS-7865) Builds (Compare 49 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 34%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: MSI AM1I (MS-7865)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 27% - Poor Total price: $80
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $48
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback