Performance Results


Gaming 44% Speed boat	Desktop 63% Destroyer	Workstation 36% Jet ski


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (28th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 72 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 57.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	75.3% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	36.2% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (28%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing below expectations (28^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon E5-2620 0 5 User benchmarks, average bench 60% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 2.25 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (40^th percentile)	57.6% Above average	Memory 78.8 1-Core 47.7 2-Core 113 50% 79.9 Pts	4-Core 199 8-Core 322 32% 260 Pts	64-Core 363 22% 363 Pts
Poor: 57% ↑ This bench: 57.6% Great: 64%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3050-$250 43,922 User benchmarks, average bench 75% Nvidia(10DE 163D) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 528.24 Performing below potential (61^st percentile) - GPU OC Guide	75.3% Very good	Lighting 102 Reflection 83.5 Parallax 90.2 83% 91.9 fps	MRender 86.4 Gravity 72.2 Splatting 64.8 60% 74.5 fps
Poor: 69% ↑ This bench: 75.3% Great: 79%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
BR 120GB 120GB 93 User benchmarks, average bench 59% 20GB free (System drive) Firmware: FW200326 SusWrite @10s intervals: 186 128 71 18 32 14 MB/s Performing below potential (3^rd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	36.2% Below average	Read 232 Write 215 Mixed 199 SusWrite 74.8 40% 180 MB/s	4K Read 13.9 4K Write 36.9 4K Mixed 11.6 56% 20.8 MB/s	DQ Read 107 DQ Write 154 DQ Mixed 17.2 45% 92.8 MB/s
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 36.2% Great: 75%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Micron 36JSZF51272PZ 2x4GB 364 User benchmarks, average bench 46% 2 of 8 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1066 MHz Performing below potential (7^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	37.5% Below average	MC Read 14.1 MC Write 13.2 MC Mixed 12.2 38% 13.2 GB/s	SC Read 10 SC Write 8.2 SC Mixed 8.1 25% 8.77 GB/s	Latency 82.9 48% 82.9 ns
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 37.5% Great: 54%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $44	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16