PC Status | Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (17th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 83 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good. |
Graphics | 31.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times. |
Memory | 32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
System | Gigabyte B150-HD3P |
Motherboard | Gigabyte GA-B150-HD3P-CF (all builds) |
Memory | 26 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit kleuren |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20180309 |
Uptime | 0 Days |
Run Date | Jan 28 '23 at 22:28 |
Run Duration | 109 Seconds |
Run User | NLD-User |
Background CPU | 19% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
73.3%
Very good
|
||||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 960-$198
CLim: 1493 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 527.56
Performing below potential (46th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
31.5%
Below average
|
|||
Drive | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Toshiba DT01ACA200 2TB-$40
657GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MX4OABB0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 67 30 30 70 39 58 MB/s
|
19.4%
Very poor
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Kingston 9905625-030.A00G 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
|
67.9%
Good
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core i5-6500Intel $67Bench 64%, 241,476 samples | 151x |
Core i5-6400Intel $76Bench 61%, 171,457 samples | 96x |
Core i7-6700Intel $180Bench 72%, 282,363 samples | 58x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples | 89x |
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples | 55x |
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples | 45x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 79% - Very good | Total price: $278 |