Asus H81M-PLUS

Performance Results

Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop 60%
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 57.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics4.95% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive37.1% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (34%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
16 months ago, 16 months ago.
MotherboardAsus H81M-PLUS  (all builds)
Memory8.4 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1440 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130902
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateJan 28 '23 at 22:10
Run Duration128 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 34%

 PC Performing as expected (57th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-4340-$60
SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
57.3% Above average
Memory 77.3
1-Core 95.9
2-Core 160
66% 111 Pts
4-Core 215
8-Core 230
30% 223 Pts
64-Core 236
15% 236 Pts
Poor: 49%
This bench: 57.3%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 6570
Device(1B0A 909E) 1GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.2501.0
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
4.95% Terrible
Lighting 6.4
Reflection 6.6
Parallax 5.4
5% 6.13 fps
MRender 5.9
Gravity 5.1
Splatting 5.3
4% 5.43 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 4.95%
Great: 5%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
HP S600 120GB
60GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 09C1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 41 57 41 53 56 49 MB/s
Performing below potential (10th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
37.1% Below average
Read 159
Write 55.3
Mixed 13.7
SusWrite 49.6
15% 69.4 MB/s
4K Read 26.7
4K Write 56
4K Mixed 12.1
86% 31.6 MB/s
DQ Read 86.4
DQ Write 52.5
DQ Mixed 20
28% 53 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 37.1%
Great: 79%
Samsung HD502HJ 500GB-$50
297GB free
Firmware: 00E4
SusWrite @10s intervals: 126 126 126 127 127 127 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
81.4% Excellent
Read 157
Write 30.6
Mixed 74.9
SusWrite 126
72% 97.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2.9
4K Mixed 1
190% 1.5 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 81.4%
Great: 77%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston KHX1600C10D3/8GX KHX1600C9D3/4GX 12GB
1333, 1333 MHz
8192, 4096 MB
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
48.5% Average
MC Read 16.5
MC Write 17.9
MC Mixed 15.5
48% 16.6 GB/s
SC Read 13.8
SC Write 18.3
SC Mixed 15.1
45% 15.7 GB/s
Latency 85.7
47% 85.7 ns
Poor: 24%
This bench: 48.5%
Great: 52%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H81M-PLUS Builds (Compare 2,886 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop 60%
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus H81M-PLUS - $98

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 59% - Above average Total price: $343
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $239Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-12400F $109Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $397
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback