Performance Results


Gaming 9% Tree trunk	Desktop 62% Destroyer	Workstation 8% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (32nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 68 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 65.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	5.07% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	71.7% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

15 months ago, 15 months ago.

PC Performing below expectations (32^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon E3-1245 v5 2,081 User benchmarks, average bench 76% CPU1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	65.2% Good	Memory 65.3 1-Core 100 2-Core 207 68% 124 Pts	4-Core 351 8-Core 502 54% 427 Pts	64-Core 542 34% 542 Pts
Poor: 66% ↑ This bench: 65.2% Great: 84%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD P530 (Server Skylake) 5,499 User benchmarks, average bench 5% Fijitsu Siemens(1734 121C) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 31.0.101.2115 Performing above expectations (64^th percentile)	5.07% Terrible	Lighting 6.4 Reflection 7.2 Parallax 7.4 5% 7 fps	MRender 10.8 Gravity 9 Splatting 0.3 5% 6.7 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 5.07% Great: 6%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
LK0200GEYMR 200GB 26 User benchmarks, average bench 72% 104GB free (System drive) Firmware: HPG1 SusWrite @10s intervals: 215 219 222 207 195 197 MB/s Performing as expected (54^th percentile)	71.7% Very good	Read 364 Write 222 Mixed 210 SusWrite 209 56% 251 MB/s	4K Read 26.4 4K Write 67.3 4K Mixed 25.1 108% 39.6 MB/s	DQ Read 320 DQ Write 214 DQ Mixed 226 180% 253 MB/s
Poor: 59% ↑ This bench: 71.7% Great: 86%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M391A2K43BB1-CRC 4x16GB 80 User benchmarks, average bench 100% 4 of 4 slots used 64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile)	51% Above average	MC Read 17.9 MC Write 21.1 MC Mixed 16.3 53% 18.4 GB/s	SC Read 10.6 SC Write 19.1 SC Mixed 13.4 41% 14.4 GB/s	Latency 113 35% 113 ns
Poor: 61% ↑ This bench: 51% Great: 161%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 14%

Tree trunk

Desktop 72%

Battleship

Workstation 13%

Tree trunk

CPU
Xeon E3-1245 v5IntelBench 76%, 2,081 samples	1x

GPU
HD P530 (Server Skylake)IntelBench 5%, 5,499 samples	1x

SSD
LK0200GEYMR 200GBBench 72%, 26 samples	1x

RAM
M391A2K43BB1-CRC 4x16GBSamsungBench 100%, 80 samples	1x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16