Medion MD34487/ C984

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 32% Sail boat	Desktop 69% Battle cruiser	Workstation 28% Raft


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (63rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 37 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 63.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	43.3% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

17 months ago, 16 months ago, 15 months ago.

System	Medion MD34487/ C984 (all builds)
Motherboard	MEDION B350A4-EM
Memory	10.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit färger, 1440 x 900 - 32 Bit färger
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20190220
Uptime	9.8 Days
Run Date	Jan 28 '23 at 14:54
Run Duration	127 Seconds
Run User	SWE-User
Background CPU	3%

Watch Gameplay: 1650 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing above expectations (63^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 5 2400G-$135 127,344 User benchmarks, average bench 63% AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.35 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (65^th percentile)	63.9% Good	Memory 71.6 1-Core 90.9 2-Core 175 64% 112 Pts	4-Core 302 8-Core 525 50% 414 Pts	64-Core 521 32% 521 Pts
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 63.9% Great: 73%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1650-$155 259,091 User benchmarks, average bench 43% Asus(1043 87A7) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2130 MHz, MLim: 3000 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 528.24 Performing below potential (66^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	43.3% Average	Lighting 54 Reflection 56 Parallax 50.1 44% 53.4 fps	MRender 60.6 Gravity 49.7 Splatting 45.7 42% 52 fps
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 43.3% Great: 46%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
E12-256G-PHISON-SSD-B3-BB1 256GB 650 User benchmarks, average bench 140% 14GB free (System drive) Firmware: ECFM12.3 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 1,249 Write 613 Mixed 884 202% 915 MB/s	4K Read 32.6 4K Write 76.3 4K Mixed 47.8 151% 52.2 MB/s	DQ Read 698 DQ Write 386 DQ Mixed 404 337% 496 MB/s
Poor: 93% Great: 187%
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$28 763,289 User benchmarks, average bench 84% 163GB free Firmware: MS2OA750 SusWrite @10s intervals: 120 125 122 124 125 125 MB/s Performing as expected (51^st percentile)	86.2% Excellent	Read 177 Write 190 Mixed 35.6 SusWrite 124 95% 132 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 1.9 4K Mixed 0.5 124% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 86.2% Great: 107%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M378A1K43CB2-CTD 2x8GB 29,586 User benchmarks, average bench 80% 2 of 2 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 2666 MHz clocked @ 1333 MHz Performing above expectations (70^th percentile)	84.3% Excellent	MC Read 31.3 MC Write 33.1 MC Mixed 28.6 89% 31 GB/s	SC Read 19.9 SC Write 28.8 SC Mixed 23.2 68% 24 GB/s	Latency 97.7 41% 97.7 ns
Poor: 61% ↑ This bench: 84.3% Great: 96%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical MD34487/ C984 Builds (Compare 1 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 0%

Incomplete

Desktop 0%

Incomplete

Workstation 0%

Incomplete

System: Medion MD34487/ C984

CPU
Ryzen 5 2400GAMD $135Bench 63%, 127,344 samples	1x

GPU
Radeon RX560AMDBench 21%, 135 samples	1x

RAM
M378A1K43CB2-CTD 2x8GBSamsungBench 80%, 29,586 samples	1x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 76% - Very good

Total price: $135

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

Medion MD34487/ C984

Performance Results

Run History

PC Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)

System Memory Latency Ladder

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

System: Medion MD34487/ C984

Feedback

PC Performing above expectations (63^rd percentile)