MSI A320M PRO-VH (MS-7C52)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 87%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 78%
Battleship
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (79th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 21 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 78.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics104% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive81.6% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
16 months ago, 16 months ago.
SystemMicro-Star MS-7C52
MotherboardMSI A320M PRO-VH (MS-7C52)  (all builds)
Memory12.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit renk
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20220725
Uptime0.7 Days
Run DateJan 28 '23 at 11:32
Run Duration152 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU8%
Watch Gameplay How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (79th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 2600-$150
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
78.3% Very good
Memory 83.7
1-Core 114
2-Core 213
78% 137 Pts
4-Core 392
8-Core 640
63% 516 Pts
64-Core 794
49% 794 Pts
Poor: 67%
This bench: 78.3%
Great: 81%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2060S (Super)-$510
Nvidia(10DE 134E) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2160 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 528.02
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
104% Outstanding
Lighting 127
Reflection 180
Parallax 131
104% 146 fps
MRender 187
Gravity 115
Splatting 106
108% 136 fps
Poor: 90%
This bench: 104%
Great: 106%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kioxia-exceria SATA SSD 240GB
179GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFA15.5
SusWrite @10s intervals: 352 152 127 118 113 130 MB/s
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
81.6% Excellent
Read 366
Write 124
Mixed 332
SusWrite 165
55% 247 MB/s
4K Read 36.3
4K Write 72.6
4K Mixed 39.1
144% 49.3 MB/s
DQ Read 266
DQ Write 305
DQ Mixed 208
178% 260 MB/s
Poor: 38%
This bench: 81.6%
Great: 91%
XPG SPECTRIX S40G 512GB
116GB free
Firmware: VB421D57
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1140 643 295 102 177 211 MB/s
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
213% Outstanding
Read 2,245
Write 1,396
Mixed 1,354
SusWrite 428
301% 1,356 MB/s
4K Read 44.4
4K Write 93
4K Mixed 58.4
191% 65.3 MB/s
DQ Read 961
DQ Write 716
DQ Mixed 814
615% 830 MB/s
Poor: 75%
This bench: 213%
Great: 309%
Fury 256GB 256GB
193GB free
Firmware: HPS1104C
SusWrite @10s intervals: 399 407 389 431 36 20 MB/s
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
79.5% Very good
Read 448
Write 427
Mixed 375
SusWrite 280
86% 383 MB/s
4K Read 41.5
4K Write 82.9
4K Mixed 13.2
124% 45.9 MB/s
DQ Read 138
DQ Write 292
DQ Mixed 16.2
69% 149 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 79.5%
Great: 89%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB-$36
2 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
109% Outstanding
MC Read 44
MC Write 40.6
MC Mixed 35
114% 39.9 GB/s
SC Read 27.1
SC Write 37
SC Mixed 29
89% 31 GB/s
Latency 73.9
54% 73.9 ns
Poor: 63%
This bench: 109%
Great: 109%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical A320M PRO-VH (MS-7C52) Builds (Compare 360 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: MSI A320M PRO-VH (MS-7C52)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 77% - Very good Total price: $178
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. When UserBenchmark’s data contradicts their marketing spiel, they deflect by systematically attacking our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a large proportion lot of their profit from flagship hardware sales (4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc.). UserBenchmark's data helps consumers to choose hardware that offers similar real world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to make positive content about us. In addition, the brands with weaker products tend to spend more on youtube marketing, which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community that's open and accessible to all. Looking at its 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, which are mostly written by virgin accounts, it is glaringly obvious that they were created by a marketing team. Real users don’t have any time or interest to promote one brand over another.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of trying to win lucrative sponsorship deals with billion dollar PC brands, we have spent the last 13 years 100% focussed on providing comprehensive, accurate and relevant information for our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again because collectively they save millions of dollars every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback