Asus MAXIMUS VII RANGER

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 44%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 37%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (61st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 39 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics50.6% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive111% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (25%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsus MAXIMUS VII RANGER  (all builds)
Memory28.3 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180418
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 28 '23 at 11:12
Run Duration179 Seconds
Run User ESP-User
Background CPU 25%
Watch Gameplay: 580 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (61st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E3-1230 v3-$217
SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
76% Very good
Memory 92.6
1-Core 65.6
2-Core 199
68% 119 Pts
4-Core 321
8-Core 498
51% 409 Pts
64-Core 512
32% 512 Pts
Poor: 62%
This bench: 76%
Great: 80%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 580-$130
CLim: 1210 MHz, MLim: 2100 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 22.20.27.07
Performing below potential (50th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
50.6% Above average
Lighting 64.6
Reflection 58.5
Parallax 81.7
53% 68.3 fps
MRender 63.5
Gravity 71.1
Splatting 42.5
47% 59 fps
Poor: 46%
This bench: 50.6%
Great: 56%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingbank KP230 1TB
667GB free (System drive)
Firmware: V2.11.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 367 351 388 604 599 603 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
111% Outstanding
Read 628
Write 558
Mixed 502
SusWrite 485
122% 543 MB/s
4K Read 39.6
4K Write 64.1
4K Mixed 32
135% 45.2 MB/s
DQ Read 280
DQ Write 430
DQ Mixed 64.6
130% 258 MB/s
Poor: 120%
This bench: 111%
Great: 305%
SanDisk SSD Plus 120GB-$42
111GB free
Firmware: Z22000RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 183 197 197 204 203 204 MB/s
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
64.6% Good
Read 474
Write 186
Mixed 193
SusWrite 198
58% 263 MB/s
4K Read 22.7
4K Write 66.6
4K Mixed 13.1
86% 34.1 MB/s
DQ Read 181
DQ Write 203
DQ Mixed 78.8
91% 154 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 64.6%
Great: 78%
Kingston SSDNow V300 120GB-$36
112GB free
Firmware: 603ABBF0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 79 96 96 96 92 97 MB/s
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
55.3% Above average
Read 270
Write 116
Mixed 160
SusWrite 92.8
35% 160 MB/s
4K Read 24.1
4K Write 64.2
4K Mixed 30.5
110% 39.6 MB/s
DQ Read 93.7
DQ Write 127
DQ Mixed 105
81% 109 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 55.3%
Great: 73%
WD WD5000AACS-00ZUB0 500GB
323GB free
Firmware: 01.01B01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 69 71 72 71 70 72 MB/s
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
43% Average
Read 78.5
Write 41.1
Mixed 45.1
SusWrite 70.9
43% 58.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 0.8
161% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 43%
Great: 49%
SAMSUNG HD204UI 2TB
1TB free, PID 022a
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 106 105 106 105 104 105 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
47.5% Average
Read 111
Write 131
Mixed 66.8
SusWrite 105
140% 104 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2.7
4K Mixed 1
128% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 47.5%
Great: 51%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HyperX DDR3 2400 C11 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR3 2400 MHz clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (60th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
76.7% Very good
MC Read 27.8
MC Write 29.5
MC Mixed 25
78% 27.4 GB/s
SC Read 18.8
SC Write 20.2
SC Mixed 24.8
61% 21.3 GB/s
Latency 62.8
64% 62.8 ns
Poor: 44%
This bench: 76.7%
Great: 109%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MAXIMUS VII RANGER Builds (Compare 2,813 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 43%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 36%
Jet ski

Motherboard: Asus MAXIMUS VII RANGER - $283

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 63% - Good Total price: $916
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback