Gigabyte GA-A320M-S2H-CF

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (67th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 33 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 95.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Boot Drive51.1% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
High background CPU (27%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemGigabyte A320M-S2H
MotherboardGigabyte GA-A320M-S2H-CF  (all builds)
Memory11 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.9 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20220607
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 28 '23 at 03:58
Run Duration150 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU 27%

 PC Performing above expectations (67th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 5500-$80
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
95.3% Outstanding
Memory 80.8
1-Core 156
2-Core 311
98% 182 Pts
4-Core 590
8-Core 846
90% 718 Pts
64-Core 1087
67% 1087 Pts
Poor: 71%
This bench: 95.3%
Great: 101%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
KSQ120 120GB
23GB free (System drive)
Firmware: T181207
SusWrite @10s intervals: 33 17 41 25 27 29 MB/s
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
51.1% Above average
Read 557
Write 38.4
Mixed 58.6
SusWrite 28.4
36% 171 MB/s
4K Read 22.8
4K Write 29.3
4K Mixed 22.5
79% 24.9 MB/s
DQ Read 81.8
DQ Write 36.6
DQ Mixed 44
37% 54.1 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 51.1%
Great: 86%
SSD 360GB 360GB
57GB free
Firmware: FW200326
SusWrite @10s intervals: 39 14 19 25 13 47 MB/s
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
42.7% Average
Read 461
Write 166
Mixed 19.7
SusWrite 26.1
36% 168 MB/s
4K Read 37.3
4K Write 8.9
4K Mixed 4.6
67% 16.9 MB/s
DQ Read 180
DQ Write 9.7
DQ Mixed 5.9
27% 65.3 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 42.7%
Great: 84%
SSD 512GB 512GB
124GB free
Firmware: VC2S038B
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1438 1513 702 202 202 205 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
214% Outstanding
Read 1,880
Write 1,380
Mixed 1265
SusWrite 710
292% 1,309 MB/s
4K Read 41.3
4K Write 104
4K Mixed 55.4
188% 66.8 MB/s
DQ Read 713
DQ Write 948
DQ Mixed 886
654% 849 MB/s
Poor: 38%
This bench: 214%
Great: 211%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston KHX2666C16/8G Adata DDR4 2666 16GB
2933, 2933 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
85.7% Excellent
MC Read 30.6
MC Write 29.4
MC Mixed 29.9
86% 30 GB/s
SC Read 26
SC Write 40
SC Mixed 24.4
86% 30.1 GB/s
Latency 79.1
51% 79.1 ns
Poor: 48%
This bench: 85.7%
Great: 102%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-A320M-S2H-CF Builds (Compare 7,705 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 39%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 36%
Jet ski

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-A320M-S2H-CF - $70

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 90% - Outstanding Total price: $413
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback