Gigabyte GA-970A-DS3P FX

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 26%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 52.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics50.4% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (51%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-970A-DS3P FX  (all builds)
Memory16 GB free of 24 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170713
Uptime0.8 Days
Run DateJan 28 '23 at 02:17
Run Duration233 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 51%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (38th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-6300-$90
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 3 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
52.9% Above average
Memory 83.2
1-Core 49.1
2-Core 89.6
49% 74 Pts
4-Core 128
8-Core 169
19% 149 Pts
64-Core 178
11% 178 Pts
Poor: 44%
This bench: 52.9%
Great: 62%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117
EVGA(3842 6366) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 527.37
Performing below potential (9th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
50.4% Above average
Lighting 64.7
Reflection 73.5
Parallax 56.8
53% 65 fps
MRender 54.7
Gravity 59.2
Splatting 54.6
46% 56.2 fps
Poor: 51%
This bench: 50.4%
Great: 60%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Toshiba DT01ACA050 500GB-$25
62GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MS1OA7C0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 112 110 119 109 121 120 MB/s
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
80.9% Excellent
Read 167
Write 109
Mixed 31.9
SusWrite 115
76% 106 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.5
120% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 80.9%
Great: 103%
Philips USB Flash Drive 32GB
29GB free, PID 4300
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Read 25
Mixed 5.7
13% 15.4 MB/s
4K Read 3.6
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
13% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 3% Great: 7%
WD My Book 1230 2TB
833GB free, PID 1230
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 108 109 109 108 110 106 MB/s
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
45.5% Average
Read 102
Write 105
Mixed 65.5
SusWrite 108
129% 95 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 0.8
108% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 45.5%
Great: 59%
SanDisk Cruzer Glide 16GB
12GB free, PID 5575
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 5.1 4.6 3.9 4.8 4.5 4.4 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Read 303
Write 3.5
Mixed 6
SusWrite 4.5
55% 79.2 MB/s
4K Read 22.4
4K Mixed 0
125% 11.2 MB/s
Poor: 7% Great: 17%
SanDisk Cruzer Glide 16GB
15GB free, PID 5575
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 5.2 4.6 4.7 4.3 4.8 4.4 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Read 204
Write 6.2
Mixed 8.5
SusWrite 4.6
41% 55.9 MB/s
4K Read 21.2
4K Mixed 0
118% 10.6 MB/s
Poor: 7% Great: 17%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston KHX1600C9D3/4 KHX1866C10D3/ KHX1600C9D3/4 KHX1866C10D3/ 24GB
667, 933, 667, 933 MHz
4096, 8192, 4096, 8192 MB
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
40.6% Average
MC Read 15.9
MC Write 12.4
MC Mixed 14.7
41% 14.3 GB/s
SC Read 8.8
SC Write 7.7
SC Mixed 10.9
26% 9.13 GB/s
Latency 74.8
53% 74.8 ns
Poor: 31%
This bench: 40.6%
Great: 53%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-970A-DS3P FX Builds (Compare 431 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 20%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 16%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-970A-DS3P FX

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 60% - Good Total price: $249
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing charade so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit a lot from flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year so they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback