Samsung 350V5(C|X) 350V4(C|X) 351V5(C|X) 351V4(C|X) 3540V(C|X)

Performance Results


Gaming 6% Tree trunk	Desktop 48% Yacht	Workstation 6% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (37th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 63 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 47.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	1.59% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	57.1% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (23%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

15 months ago, 15 months ago, 15 months ago, 15 months ago, 15 months ago.

System	Samsung 350V5(C\|X) 350V4(C\|X) 351V5(C\|X) 351V4(C\|X) 3540V(C\|X) (all builds)
Motherboard	SAMSUNG NP350V5C-S0ETR
Memory	11.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit renk
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20120824
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jan 28 '23 at 00:30
Run Duration	129 Seconds
Run User	TUR-User
Background CPU	23%

PC Performing below expectations (37^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-3210M-$52 79,744 User benchmarks, average bench 48% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 2.9 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (46^th percentile)	47.5% Average	Memory 68.5 1-Core 67.8 2-Core 110 51% 82.3 Pts	4-Core 156 8-Core 153 21% 155 Pts	64-Core 149 9% 149 Pts
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 47.5% Great: 57%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz) FAQ - How to force Optimus or Switchable discrete GPUs? Sanyo(144D C0D8) 2GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.5161 Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	1.59% Terrible	Lighting 1.5 Reflection 6.5 Parallax 1.9 1% 3.3 fps	MRender 2.9 Gravity 1.8 Splatting 3.5 2% 2.73 fps
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 1.59% Great: 4%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
MLD M200 SATA SSD 240GB 127 User benchmarks, average bench 69% 107GB free (System drive) Firmware: SBFM61.5 SusWrite @10s intervals: 203 127 98 46 65 63 MB/s Performing below expectations (20^th percentile)	57.1% Above average	Read 427 Write 292 Mixed 307 SusWrite 100 63% 282 MB/s	4K Read 21.5 4K Write 43.6 4K Mixed 21.5 83% 28.9 MB/s	DQ Read 198 DQ Write 180 DQ Mixed 52.8 77% 144 MB/s
Poor: 45% ↑ This bench: 57.1% Great: 89%
HGST Travelstar 7K750 2.5" 750GB-$77 8,773 User benchmarks, average bench 49% 655GB free Firmware: JF4OA0D0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 114 117 119 117 118 119 MB/s Performing way above expectations (93^rd percentile)	65.7% Good	Read 112 Write 94.9 Mixed 57.8 SusWrite 117 70% 95.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.4 4K Mixed 0.7 129% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 21% ↑ This bench: 65.7% Great: 68%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL F3 DDR3 1600 C11 2x8GB 393 User benchmarks, average bench 52% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing below potential (18^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	48.2% Average	MC Read 17.5 MC Write 18.3 MC Mixed 15.5 49% 17.1 GB/s	SC Read 14.2 SC Write 13.6 SC Mixed 14.8 41% 14.2 GB/s	Latency 105 38% 105 ns
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 48.2% Great: 58%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical 350V5C/350V5X/350V4C/350V4X/351V5C/351V5X/351V4C/351V4X/3540VC/3 Builds (Compare 351 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 7%

Tree trunk

Desktop 49%

Yacht

Workstation 6%

Tree trunk

System: Samsung 350V5(C|X) 350V4(C|X) 351V5(C|X) 351V4(C|X) 3540V(C|X)

CPU
Core i5-3210MIntel $52Bench 48%, 79,744 samples	118x
Core i7-3630QMIntel $420Bench 61%, 65,927 samples	69x
Core i3-3110MIntel $70Bench 48%, 34,445 samples	51x

GPU
HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz)IntelBench 3%, 409,110 samples	314x
HD Graphics (G2 Pentium/Celeron 1.1/1.15 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 45,735 samples	17x
HD 3000 (Mobile V1 1.1/1.2 GHz)IntelBench 2%, 209,058 samples	14x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	15x
TOSHIBA-TR200 240GBBench 71%, 36,832 samples	8x
PLUS 240GBSandiskBench 45%, 86,316 samples	5x

RAM
M471B5273EB0-CK0 2x4GBSamsungBench 51%, 5,979 samples	39x
M471B5273EB0-CK0 1x4GBSamsungBench 28%, 3,287 samples	27x
M471B5273CH0-CK0 2x4GBSamsungBench 48%, 5,165 samples	16x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 57% - Above average

Total price: $80

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16