Lenovo 81LK

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 64%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (21st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 79 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 65.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics4.46% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive137% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemLenovo 81LK  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO LNVNB161216
Memory11 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20220524
Uptime3.9 Days
Run DateJan 27 '23 at 23:10
Run Duration113 Seconds
Run User ARG-User
Background CPU10%

 PC Performing below expectations (21st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-9750H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 2.6 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
65.6% Good
Memory 79.5
1-Core 86
2-Core 190
68% 118 Pts
4-Core 280
8-Core 424
44% 352 Pts
64-Core 464
29% 464 Pts
Poor: 49%
This bench: 65.6%
Great: 87%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1650 (Mobile)
Legend(17AA 3A2E) ≥ 4GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 27.21.14.5749
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
4.46% Terrible
Lighting 5.5
Reflection 4.8
Parallax 5
4% 5.1 fps
MRender 8
Gravity 4.1
Splatting 4.6
4% 5.57 fps
Poor: 28%
This bench: 4.46%
Great: 46%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WDC PC SN520 SDAPMUW-512G-1101 512GB
397GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 20210001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 717 700 732 724 730 734 MB/s
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
137% Outstanding
Read 783
Write 1,086
Mixed 827
SusWrite 723
193% 855 MB/s
4K Read 25.2
4K Write 70
4K Mixed 44
132% 46.4 MB/s
DQ Read 508
DQ Write 380
DQ Mixed 518
368% 469 MB/s
Poor: 105%
This bench: 137%
Great: 200%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 1x16GB
1 of 1 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
33.1% Below average
MC Read 12.8
MC Write 10.9
MC Mixed 9
31% 10.9 GB/s
SC Read 9.7
SC Write 10.8
SC Mixed 10.2
29% 10.2 GB/s
Latency 81.5
49% 81.5 ns
Poor: 27%
This bench: 33.1%
Great: 115%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 81LK Builds (Compare 6,344 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 29%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 24%
Surfboard

System: Lenovo 81LK

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, UserBenchmark's data exposes the youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback