Asus M5A97 R2.0

Performance Results


Gaming 30% Sail boat	Desktop 69% Battle cruiser	Workstation 25% Raft


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (64th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 36 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	43.3% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	28.4% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (31%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

17 months ago, 17 months ago, 16 months ago, 16 months ago, 16 months ago, 16 months ago.

Motherboard	Asus M5A97 R2.0 (all builds)
Memory	10.2 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	Цвета: 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20150324
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jan 27 '23 at 20:39
Run Duration	127 Seconds
Run User	RUS-User
Background CPU	31%

PC Performing above expectations (64^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD FX-9370-$183 9,054 User benchmarks, average bench 62% Socket 942, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 4.4 GHz, turbo 4.4 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (72^nd percentile)	64.1% Good	Memory 82.7 1-Core 73.7 2-Core 136 60% 97.4 Pts	4-Core 247 8-Core 395 39% 321 Pts	64-Core 431 27% 431 Pts
Poor: 55% ↑ This bench: 64.1% Great: 70%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD RX 580-2048SP 38,816 User benchmarks, average bench 41% AMD(1002 0B31) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1286 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 22.11.2 Performing below potential (75^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	43.3% Average	Lighting 52.8 Reflection 59.6 Parallax 74.7 43% 62.4 fps	MRender 59.5 Gravity 60.7 Splatting 44.5 44% 54.9 fps
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 43.3% Great: 47%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
WD Green 120GB (2018)-$59 69,933 User benchmarks, average bench 43% 33GB free (System drive) Firmware: UE300000 SusWrite @10s intervals: 26 32 47 47 24 50 MB/s Performing below potential (2^nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	28.4% Poor	Read 241 Write 66.4 Mixed 5.7 SusWrite 37.7 19% 87.7 MB/s	4K Read 17.3 4K Write 14.2 4K Mixed 8.3 44% 13.3 MB/s	DQ Read 112 DQ Write 44.2 DQ Mixed 31.6 36% 62.5 MB/s
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 28.4% Great: 53%
WD Green 500GB (2012) 31,295 User benchmarks, average bench 57% 137GB free Firmware: 01.01A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 135 139 132 140 146 147 MB/s Performing way above expectations (92^nd percentile)	73.6% Very good	Read 117 Write 82 Mixed 40.5 SusWrite 140 69% 94.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 0.5 4K Mixed 0.5 102% 0.63 MB/s
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 73.6% Great: 79%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown R534G1601U1S R534G1601U1S Hynix AV34G1601H1-U0 12GB 5 User benchmarks, average bench 41% 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz 4096, 4096, 4096 MB Performing above expectations (80^th percentile)	45.4% Average	MC Read 18.5 MC Write 14.9 MC Mixed 14.8 46% 16.1 GB/s	SC Read 10.6 SC Write 9.7 SC Mixed 12.7 31% 11 GB/s	Latency 75.7 53% 75.7 ns
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 45.4% Great: 47%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical M5A97 R2.0 Builds (Compare 2,842 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 23%

Surfboard

Desktop 69%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 19%

Surfboard

Motherboard: Asus M5A97 R2.0 - $89

CPU
FX-8350AMD $130Bench 61%, 313,196 samples	876x
FX-6300AMD $90Bench 55%, 261,607 samples	649x
FX-8320AMD $125Bench 59%, 106,454 samples	442x

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	187x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	161x
RX 480AMD $75Bench 46%, 261,163 samples	122x

SSD
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $76Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	86x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	85x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	77x

RAM
Fury DDR3 1866 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 59%, 122,541 samples	85x
Savage DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GBHyperXBench 51%, 78,181 samples	56x
Fury DDR3 1866 C10 2x4GBHyperX $35Bench 51%, 38,490 samples	50x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 71% - Very good

Total price: $354

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $549	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16