Colorful DJ A320M-M.2 PRO

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 65.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics10.3% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive80.7% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemColorful DJ A320M-M.2 PRO  (all builds)
MotherboardColorful DJ A320M-M.2 PRO
Memory4.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit kleuren
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date
Uptime2.2 Days
Run DateJan 27 '23 at 15:29
Run Duration114 Seconds
Run User NLD-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing as expected (52nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 3 2200G-$104
AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
65.5% Good
Memory 69.5
1-Core 105
2-Core 217
72% 130 Pts
4-Core 352
8-Core 374
48% 363 Pts
64-Core 369
23% 369 Pts
Poor: 43%
This bench: 65.5%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX Vega 8 (Ryzen iGPU)
AMD(1002 15DD) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 22.20.27.07
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
10.3% Very poor
Lighting 13.1
Reflection 11.7
Parallax 18.7
11% 14.5 fps
MRender 6.2
Gravity 15.5
Splatting 12.3
9% 11.3 fps
Poor: 7%
This bench: 10.3%
Great: 11%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Zhitai SC001 Active 256GB SSD
184GB free (System drive)
Firmware: ZT013200
SusWrite @10s intervals: 330 163 165 170 166 125 MB/s
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
80.7% Excellent
Read 439
Write 428
Mixed 418
SusWrite 186
83% 368 MB/s
4K Read 31.7
4K Write 63.4
4K Mixed 36.3
128% 43.8 MB/s
DQ Read 254
DQ Write 291
DQ Mixed 286
212% 277 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 80.7%
Great: 104%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown BL8G32C16U4W.M8FE 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 2667 MHz clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below potential (17th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
42.4% Average
MC Read 15.9
MC Write 14.4
MC Mixed 13.4
42% 14.6 GB/s
SC Read 14.7
SC Write 14
SC Mixed 13.2
40% 14 GB/s
Latency 102
39% 102 ns
Poor: 35%
This bench: 42.4%
Great: 63%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical DJ A320M-M.2 PRO Builds (Compare 7 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 69%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 56%
Gunboat

System: Colorful DJ A320M-M.2 PRO

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 114% - Outstanding Total price: $273
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback