Alienware M17xR4

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 68.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics3.15% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive47.1% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (17%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemAlienware M17xR4  (all builds)
MotherboardAlienware M17xR4
Memory2.3 GB free of 6 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180528
Uptime0.5 Days
Run DateJan 27 '23 at 11:53
Run Duration126 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU 17%

 PC Performing as expected (52nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3630QM-$420
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
68.4% Good
Memory 82.7
1-Core 82.2
2-Core 163
65% 109 Pts
4-Core 295
8-Core 411
44% 353 Pts
64-Core 414
26% 414 Pts
Poor: 42%
This bench: 68.4%
Great: 69%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz)
Dell(1028 0551) 2GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.4252
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
3.15% Terrible
Lighting 3.9
Reflection 1.9
Parallax 2.8
3% 2.87 fps
MRender 4.5
Gravity 2.3
Splatting 4.4
3% 3.73 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 3.15%
Great: 4%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial M4 256GB-$218
62GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 000F
SusWrite @10s intervals: 138 116 113 110 127 127 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
47.1% Average
Read 425
Write 249
Mixed 257
SusWrite 122
58% 263 MB/s
4K Read 14.9
4K Write 36.8
4K Mixed 12.5
58% 21.4 MB/s
DQ Read 125
DQ Write 116
DQ Mixed 23.5
44% 88.1 MB/s
Poor: 43%
This bench: 47.1%
Great: 74%
WD Black 2.5" 500GB (2011)-$50
455GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 110 111 108 111 110 108 MB/s
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
60% Good
Read 99.6
Write 105
Mixed 69.9
SusWrite 110
71% 96 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.9
160% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 60%
Great: 65%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT325S6CFR8C-PB Kingston KFYHV1-HYC 6GB
1600, 1600 MHz
2048, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (23rd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
34.8% Below average
MC Read 12.9
MC Write 10.9
MC Mixed 10.3
32% 11.4 GB/s
SC Read 11
SC Write 10.9
SC Mixed 10.7
31% 10.9 GB/s
Latency 75.6
53% 75.6 ns
Poor: 24%
This bench: 34.8%
Great: 54%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical M17xR4 Builds (Compare 672 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 58%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: Alienware M17xR4

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 46% - Average Total price: $520
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback