FEC FCLH310

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 47%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (33rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 67 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 47%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics2.66% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive71.9% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemFEC FCLH310  (all builds)
MotherboardFEC FCLH310
Memory4.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit kleuren
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20211007
Uptime15.7 Days
Run DateJan 27 '23 at 10:02
Run Duration120 Seconds
Run User NLD-User
Background CPU 100%

 PC Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Celeron G4900T
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 2.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
47% Average
Memory 72.4
1-Core 48.4
2-Core 101
46% 73.8 Pts
4-Core 130
8-Core 117
17% 124 Pts
64-Core 120
7% 120 Pts
Poor: 41%
This bench: 47%
Great: 61%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 610
Intel(8086 2212) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.8682
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
2.66% Terrible
Lighting 2.8
Reflection 2.4
Parallax 3.5
2% 2.9 fps
MRender 3.8
Gravity 0.2
Splatting 7.2
3% 3.73 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 2.66%
Great: 3%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
ADATA_IM2S3168-128GCTB4 128GB
81GB free (System drive)
Firmware: A210312b
SusWrite @10s intervals: 316 158 120 118 121 117 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
71.9% Very good
Read 417
Write 410
Mixed 412
SusWrite 158
78% 349 MB/s
4K Read 28.2
4K Write 50.4
4K Mixed 34.6
114% 37.7 MB/s
DQ Read 240
DQ Write 208
DQ Mixed 238
175% 229 MB/s
Poor: 61%
This bench: 71.9%
Great: 91%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A1K43CB1-CTD 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR4 2667 MHz clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below potential (17th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
35.1% Below average
MC Read 13.3
MC Write 15.3
MC Mixed 11.5
38% 13.4 GB/s
SC Read 4.9
SC Write 3.9
SC Mixed 3
11% 3.93 GB/s
Latency 96
42% 96 ns
Poor: 29%
This bench: 35.1%
Great: 46%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical FCLH310 Builds (Compare 2 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: FEC FCLH310

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback