Asus P8P67

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 77%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 58%
Gunboat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (83rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 17 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics112% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (33%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsus P8P67  (all builds)
Memory13.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20121101
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 27 '23 at 07:27
Run Duration120 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 33%

 PC Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-2500K-$246
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
71.2% Very good
Memory 88.2
1-Core 99.6
2-Core 176
72% 121 Pts
4-Core 312
8-Core 333
43% 322 Pts
64-Core 334
21% 334 Pts
Poor: 44%
This bench: 71.2%
Great: 79%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 6600-XT-$300
Ram: 8GB, Driver: 22.20.27.07
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
112% Outstanding
Lighting 121
Reflection 139
Parallax 240
98% 167 fps
MRender 223
Gravity 124
Splatting 192
148% 180 fps
Poor: 105%
This bench: 112%
Great: 110%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Black 2TB (2013)-$51
2TB free (System drive)
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 152 147 157 156 155 156 MB/s
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
92.3% Outstanding
Read 167
Write 154
Mixed 86.1
SusWrite 154
103% 140 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 3.2
4K Mixed 1
212% 1.73 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 92.3%
Great: 112%
Seagate ST9320423ASG 320GB
221GB free
Firmware: 0003SDM1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 82 81 82 82 83 83 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
47.8% Average
Read 84.1
Write 82.7
Mixed 43.3
SusWrite 82.4
54% 73.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 0.7
119% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 18%
This bench: 47.8%
Great: 49%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown AE38G1339U2 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
53.5% Above average
MC Read 18.4
MC Write 19.4
MC Mixed 17.1
52% 18.3 GB/s
SC Read 15.6
SC Write 17.9
SC Mixed 16.8
48% 16.8 GB/s
Latency 69.4
58% 69.4 ns
Poor: 14%
This bench: 53.5%
Great: 65%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P8P67 Builds (Compare 1,500 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 36%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft

Motherboard: Asus P8P67 - $120

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 54% - Above average Total price: $666
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback