PC Status | Overall this PC is performing above expectations (79th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 21 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 65.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
Graphics | 25.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 182% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files. |
Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
System | Lenovo N (all builds) |
Motherboard | LENOVO 36E1 |
Memory | 11.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20170718 |
Uptime | 0.1 Days |
Run Date | Jan 26 '23 at 23:29 |
Run Duration | 159 Seconds |
Run User | SVK-User |
Background CPU | 29% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
![]() |
65.5%
Good
|
66% 117 Pts
|
50% 403 Pts
|
30% 489 Pts
|
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
![]() Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super)-$195
CLim: 2310 MHz, MLim: 3668 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 528.24
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
25.9%
Poor
|
1% 59.8 fps
|
74% 92.7 fps
|
|
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
![]() Samsung PM961 NVMe PCIe M.2 256GB
114GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 5L7QCXB7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 497 327 328 331 329 315 MB/s
|
182%
Outstanding
|
226% 1,026 MB/s
|
187% 63.3 MB/s
|
468% 618 MB/s
|
![]() Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$28
98GB free
Firmware: CC63
SusWrite @10s intervals: 141 146 143 146 147 145 MB/s
|
92.9%
Outstanding
|
104% 142 MB/s
|
176% 1.2 MB/s
|
|
![]() WD WD2000JS-00MHB0 200GB
57GB free
Firmware: 02.01C03
SusWrite @10s intervals: 55 54 55 55 56 56 MB/s
|
32.2%
Below average
|
34% 46.2 MB/s
|
192% 1.2 MB/s
|
|
![]() Hitachi HDS721025CLA382 250GB-$20
79GB free
Firmware: JP1OA3GH
SusWrite @10s intervals: 122 124 122 126 127 127 MB/s
|
73.9%
Very good
|
84% 115 MB/s
|
155% 1.03 MB/s
|
|
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
![]() Kingston Samsung 16GB
2667, 2667 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
|
94.2%
Outstanding
|
100% 35 GB/s
|
75% 26.1 GB/s
|
39% 102 ns
|
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
---|---|
Core i5-8400Intel $114Bench 82%, 312,220 samples | 6x |
Core i5-6400Intel $79Bench 61%, 171,457 samples | 3x |
Core i7-7700KIntel $235Bench 84%, 712,312 samples | 3x |
![]() |
|
---|---|
GTX 1080Nvidia $195Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples | 5x |
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 4x |
HD 4600 (Desktop 1.25 GHz)Intel $15Bench 3%, 230,189 samples | 3x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 117% - Outstanding | Total price: $309 |