Lenovo N

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 26%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 24%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (79th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 21 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 65.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics25.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive182% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (29%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemLenovo N  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO 36E1
Memory11.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170718
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJan 26 '23 at 23:29
Run Duration159 Seconds
Run User SVK-User
Background CPU 29%
Watch Gameplay: 1660S + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (79th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 1400-$87
AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.15 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
65.5% Good
Memory 69.6
1-Core 97.3
2-Core 184
66% 117 Pts
4-Core 332
8-Core 475
50% 403 Pts
64-Core 489
30% 489 Pts
Poor: 51%
This bench: 65.5%
Great: 69%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super)-$195
CLim: 2310 MHz, MLim: 3668 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 528.24
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
25.9% Poor
Lighting 1.3
Reflection 92.7
Parallax 85.4
1% 59.8 fps
MRender 114
Gravity 86.9
Splatting 77.5
74% 92.7 fps
Poor: 65%
This bench: 25.9%
Great: 76%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung PM961 NVMe PCIe M.2 256GB
114GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 5L7QCXB7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 497 327 328 331 329 315 MB/s
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
182% Outstanding
Read 1856
Write 1,122
Mixed 770
SusWrite 354
226% 1,026 MB/s
4K Read 43.9
4K Write 88
4K Mixed 57.9
187% 63.3 MB/s
DQ Read 711
DQ Write 506
DQ Mixed 637
468% 618 MB/s
Poor: 106%
This bench: 182%
Great: 236%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$28
98GB free
Firmware: CC63
SusWrite @10s intervals: 141 146 143 146 147 145 MB/s
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
92.9% Outstanding
Read 179
Write 170
Mixed 76
SusWrite 145
104% 142 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.9
176% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 92.9%
Great: 112%
WD WD2000JS-00MHB0 200GB
57GB free
Firmware: 02.01C03
SusWrite @10s intervals: 55 54 55 55 56 56 MB/s
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
32.2% Below average
Read 56.3
Write 39
Mixed 34
SusWrite 55.4
34% 46.2 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 1.1
192% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 32.2%
Great: 34%
Hitachi HDS721025CLA382 250GB-$20
79GB free
Firmware: JP1OA3GH
SusWrite @10s intervals: 122 124 122 126 127 127 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
73.9% Very good
Read 133
Write 134
Mixed 66.4
SusWrite 124
84% 115 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.9
155% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 19%
This bench: 73.9%
Great: 75%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston Samsung 16GB
2667, 2667 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
94.2% Outstanding
MC Read 37.6
MC Write 34.9
MC Mixed 32.5
100% 35 GB/s
SC Read 20.1
SC Write 34.1
SC Mixed 24.2
75% 26.1 GB/s
Latency 102
39% 102 ns
Poor: 58%
This bench: 94.2%
Great: 93%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical N Builds (Compare 53 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 88%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 74%
Battleship

System: Lenovo N

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 117% - Outstanding Total price: $309
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback