Lenovo 90NB001TUK

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 22%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 89%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 21%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 85.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics14.5% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive245% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
SystemLenovo 90NB001TUK  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO 317E
Memory27.1 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1842 x 1036 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20220627
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 26 '23 at 20:31
Run Duration124 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing as expected (54th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-10400-$124
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
85.5% Excellent
Memory 90.6
1-Core 122
2-Core 245
86% 153 Pts
4-Core 432
8-Core 780
73% 606 Pts
64-Core 964
60% 964 Pts
Poor: 69%
This bench: 85.5%
Great: 91%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 750-$120
Nvidia(10DE 0000) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1293 MHz, MLim: 1275 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 517.00
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
14.5% Very poor
Lighting 17.7
Reflection 16.6
Parallax 16.1
14% 16.8 fps
MRender 21.7
Gravity 18
Splatting 15
15% 18.2 fps
Poor: 13%
This bench: 14.5%
Great: 16%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Black SN750 NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB (2019)-$75
386GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 111130WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1140 990 972 999 997 993 MB/s
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
245% Outstanding
Read 1724
Write 1,750
Mixed 1,398
SusWrite 1,015
331% 1,472 MB/s
4K Read 46.1
4K Write 155
4K Mixed 69.3
241% 90.3 MB/s
DQ Read 1,011
DQ Write 758
DQ Mixed 872
656% 880 MB/s
Poor: 168%
This bench: 245%
Great: 297%
Seagate Archive HDD 8TB (2015)-$120
5TB free
Firmware: RT18
SusWrite @10s intervals: 163 163 164 163 164 164 MB/s
Performing as expected (60th percentile)
68.9% Good
Read 74.4
Write 169
Mixed 32.5
SusWrite 164
79% 110 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 7.7
4K Mixed 0.7
266% 3.17 MB/s
Poor: 21%
This bench: 68.9%
Great: 87%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung FRD4AD6B2Z1ABZZ02 2x16GB
2 of 2 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
86.6% Excellent
MC Read 31.1
MC Write 34.9
MC Mixed 26.7
88% 30.9 GB/s
SC Read 16.7
SC Write 36.8
SC Mixed 25.1
75% 26.2 GB/s
Latency 66.3
60% 66.3 ns
Poor: 55%
This bench: 86.6%
Great: 89%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 90NB001TUK Builds (Compare 34 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 14%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 90NB001TUK

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 90% - Outstanding Total price: $199
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $252Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback