Lenovo 80WR

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 32%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (29th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 71 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 24.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics5.21% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive27.4% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (70%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
16 months ago, 16 months ago.
SystemLenovo 80WR  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO LNVNB161216
Memory2.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit farver
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200608
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 26 '23 at 18:00
Run Duration120 Seconds
Run User DNK-User
Background CPU 70%

 PC Performing below expectations (29th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7500U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
24.3% Poor
Memory 7.41
1-Core 88.1
2-Core 164
41% 86.5 Pts
4-Core 234
8-Core 245
32% 239 Pts
64-Core 203
13% 203 Pts
Poor: 22%
This bench: 24.3%
Great: 61%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 620 (Mobile Kaby Lake)
Legend(17AA 2112) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 25.20.100.6373
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
5.21% Terrible
Lighting 5.8
Reflection 3.9
Parallax 6.3
5% 5.33 fps
MRender 6.5
Gravity 6
Splatting 9.3
6% 7.27 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 5.21%
Great: 6%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
HFS256G39TND-N210A 256GB
29GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 30000P10
SusWrite @10s intervals: 209 213 163 129 87 85 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
27.4% Poor
Read 126
Write 149
Mixed 167
SusWrite 148
33% 147 MB/s
4K Read 7
4K Write 9.4
4K Mixed 7.2
25% 7.87 MB/s
DQ Read 147
DQ Write 107
DQ Mixed 103
84% 119 MB/s
Poor: 54%
This bench: 27.4%
Great: 83%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown B0-CRC Samsung M471A5244CB0-CRC 8GB
2133, 2133 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
24.1% Poor
MC Read 9.8
MC Write 10
MC Mixed 8
26% 9.27 GB/s
SC Read 2.9
SC Write 8.3
SC Mixed 4.5
15% 5.23 GB/s
Latency 428
9% 428 ns
Poor: 48%
This bench: 24.1%
Great: 68%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 80WR Builds (Compare 44 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 49%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 80WR

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes the youtubers that are paid to promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback