Asus M5A99X EVO

Performance Results


Gaming 45% Yacht	Desktop 75% Battleship	Workstation 38% Jet ski


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (75th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 25 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	61.2% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	56.4% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Run History

6 years ago, 6 years ago, 5 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus M5A99X EVO (all builds)
Memory	13.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20130410
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Nov 18 '17 at 19:29
Run Duration	147 Seconds
Run User	CAN-User
Background CPU	10%

Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD FX-8350-$130 313,196 User benchmarks, average bench 61% Socket 942, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 4 GHz Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	70.6% Very good	Memory 90.9 1-Core 76.1 2-Core 150 65% 106 Pts	4-Core 273 8-Core 469 45% 371 Pts	64-Core 469 29% 469 Pts
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 70.6% Great: 68%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117 1,368,019 User benchmarks, average bench 56% Device(0000 0000) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 388.0 Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	61.2% Good	Lighting 77.9 Reflection 77.2 Parallax 67.4 64% 74.1 fps	MRender 69.2 Gravity 68.5 Splatting 69.9 57% 69.2 fps
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 61.2% Great: 60%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston SHFS37A240G 240GB 518 User benchmarks, average bench 63% 55GB free (System drive) Firmware: 583A Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (27^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 95 95 13683306 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 89 89 130850473650312 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 1851 (AB) Unknown 100 100 0 (AC) Unknown 100 100 0 (AE) Unknown 0 0 41 (B1) Unknown 0 0 98 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BD) vendor-specific 24 34 68721704984 (C2) HDA temperature 24 34 68721704984 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 120 120 13683306 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C9) Soft read error rate 120 120 13683306 (CC) Soft ECC correction 120 120 13683306 (E6) GMR head amplitude 100 100 100 (E7) Temperature 96 96 1 (E9) Unknown 0 0 17387 (EA) Unknown 0 0 9971 (F1) Unknown 0 0 9971 (F2) Unknown 0 0 12537	56.4% Above average	Read 499 Write 198 Mixed 235 68% 311 MB/s	4K Read 8.89 4K Write 72.4 4K Mixed 5.97 59% 29.1 MB/s	DQ Read 143 DQ Write 195 DQ Mixed 42.1 67% 127 MB/s
Poor: 44% ↑ This bench: 56.4% Great: 77%
Hitachi Deskstar 7K1000.C 1TB-$40 97,793 User benchmarks, average bench 57% 449GB free Firmware: JP4O Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing as expected (57^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 65536 (02) Throughput performance 133 133 106 (03) Spinup time 120 120 25790447932 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 1073 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 134 134 33 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 11393 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 658 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 1094 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 100 100 1094 (C2) HDA temperature 250 250 201864642584 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0	59.7% Above average	Read 105 Write 103 Mixed 102 78% 103 MB/s	4K Read 0.72 4K Write 1.22 4K Mixed 0.43 100% 0.79 MB/s
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 59.7% Great: 74%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 500GB-$36 203,102 User benchmarks, average bench 54% 319GB free Firmware: CC36 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing above expectations (84^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 108 99 15930201 (03) Spinup time 97 97 0 (04) Start/Stop count 93 93 7379 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 76 60 13049712552 (09) Power-on hours count 83 83 15243 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 97 97 3493 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 99 20 (BD) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 77 67 403898391 (C2) HDA temperature 23 40 64424509463 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 44 14 15930201 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (F0) Head flying hours 100 253 25675314519763 (F1) Unknown 100 253 1504822400 (F2) Unknown 100 253 934478609	65.4% Good	Read 115 Write 113 Mixed 109 85% 112 MB/s	4K Read 0.69 4K Write 1.76 4K Mixed 0.66 135% 1.04 MB/s
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 65.4% Great: 70%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 16GB 70,565 User benchmarks, average bench 41% 1333, 1333 MHz 8192, 8192 MB Performing way above expectations (86^th percentile)	48.2% Average	MC Read 19.3 MC Write 15.3 MC Mixed 16.8 49% 17.1 GB/s	SC Read 11.1 SC Write 8.3 SC Mixed 12.2 30% 10.5 GB/s	Latency 65.9 61% 65.9 ns
Poor: 25% ↑ This bench: 48.2% Great: 54%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical M5A99X EVO Builds (Compare 322 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 21%

Surfboard

Desktop 67%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 17%

Surfboard

Motherboard: Asus M5A99X EVO - $300

CPU
FX-8350AMD $130Bench 61%, 313,196 samples	74x
FX-8150AMD $770Bench 59%, 22,181 samples	50x
FX-8120AMDBench 56%, 25,690 samples	35x

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	14x
RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples	14x
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	12x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	10x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	10x
MX500 500GBCrucial $45Bench 106%, 237,241 samples	7x

RAM
16GBUnknownBench 41%, 70,565 samples	161x
8GBUnknownBench 34%, 82,857 samples	66x
32GBUnknownBench 53%, 5,781 samples	35x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 80% - Very good

Total price: $516

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $64	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16